Something nobody mentioned is the uneven heat in the house with a Woodburner, unless it is an outside kind running through the furnace.
Nawp. We built our house with R30 walls and R50 roof. With no central furnance or ducting, our bedrooms (which also have decent winter solar gain) are only a few degrees cooler than the living room, perfect for sleeping. So I'm talking ~68f vs 70-72f in living room.
Tractor: had it anyway
Chainsaw: got my dads old Stihl, runs like a champ
Splitter: share with my dad (was $700 used)
Woodstove and flue pipe: $2k during house build
No furnace or ducting required: - $3000 or more ?
Cutting only yard clearing and dead-falls for firewood: totally free wood that needs to be cleaned up anyway.
With our passive solar home design and highly insulated envelope, we only burn 4-8 FACE cords a year to heat 1700 sq ft. That's worth what, $300-600 per year around here. While I really enjoy cutting firewood and othe rmanly chores, I would never do more of the full firewood processing work just for fun; plenty of better ways to make a buck.
Economically speaking, I'm WAYYY ahead after not needing to buy a furnace, pay to run a gas line, and then pay a utility for fracking to ruin peoples ground water and blow out clouds of methane. And a Geothermal system would have added at LEAST $20-30k more to my home build. Even LD1 cannot possibly convince me that given an intelligent home design, a woodstove is not
the most economical way to heat. I looked at all the alternatives and there was no question - if you're willing to do some annual chores, wood heat is the sustainable and economical choice, hands down.