Will this be tomorrow's transportation?

Status
Not open for further replies.
/ Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #21  
Cool article however I'm floored by "Let the whole world see today what Ukraine and the world can do when they unite, how we are able to protect the world from nuclear contamination and nuclear threats,” President Petro O. Poroshenko of Ukraine said. Had they not botched it in the first place they wouldn't have needed to protect the world. Additionally, why'd it take 30 years to get it done? if that's the great example of Ukrainian united effort, lets hope they don't have any other industrial accidents.
 
/ Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #22  
Yep, until they solve the 'range' problem, electrics will remain a 'short trip' option. Some of the hybrids are onlyh good for about 30 miles on battery power.


There is no way to solve the range problem. Too many people are clueless about physics and chemistry and they believe the engineers will solve it soon. There will be no solution or manor improvement unless the Almighty adds some new elements to the periodic table.
Upgrading batteries is like horse breeders attempting large gains in endurance and strength but it is just is not there . The next technological step will have to be as different as the horse is from a JD 4020.
 
/ Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #23  
Seems the hydrogen fuel cell can be "filled up" just the same as a diesel. It does not involve an electrical plug in.

[video]http://americanhistory.si.edu/fuelcells/basics.htm[/video]

Hydrogen has fill time challanges and limits to both the pressure and the hydrid storage systems. Hydrogen molecules are so small they creep and seep through otherwise "solid" substances and cause enbrittlemet .
 
/ Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #24  
Wow
"Tesla is a stupid joke who takes money from fools with liberal arts degrees who don't know diddly squat about science or engineering. Any high school science student can tell you that the tooth fairy doesn't put the electricity in the socket to charge those idiotic things so all they end up doing is burning coal in the most inefficient manner possible."

Blaming tesla for the antiquated state of the US power grid seems a stretch. At this point the car itself is grid agnostic: it doesn't care if its coal powered, wind powered or nuclear powered. The fact that were still burning coal as a jobs program for certain coal producing states is the crime here, not that tesla has a car that from a pure performance standpoint is pretty cool. The tesla S will stomp a challenger hellcat into the ground and not break a sweat is pretty awesome. And if you compare it to dollars for energy per HP the tesla way outshines any gas powered car. If your gonna blame tesla for the way we produce power then you have to take some responsibility cuase your house is powered the same way.

From an engineering perspective electric motors are the engineering choice to move a vehicle, combustion is an engineering throwback to steam engines. Extremely inefficient.


You can't honestly call electricity efficient because the entire process of generating the electricity uas to be considered with the Tesla vehicle.
 
/ Will this be tomorrow's transportation?
  • Thread Starter
#25  
Hydrogen has fill time challanges and limits to both the pressure and the hydrid storage systems. Hydrogen molecules are so small they creep and seep through otherwise "solid" substances and cause enbrittlemet .

Guess those submarines are a figment of our imagination?

The periodic table has had some new additions.
 
Last edited:
/ Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #26  
When I saw this thread I expected to see a picture of a horse and buggy!
 
/ Will this be tomorrow's transportation?
  • Thread Starter
#27  
Horse and buggy! A very pleasant relaxing way to travell. A good team and it might be called auto pilot.

Horse and sleigh were our wintertime transportation in my adolescent years. Still got the foot warmer too.
 
/ Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #28  
Our problem with hydrogen as an energy source is that its a disruptive technology. All of our current delivery mechanisms for energy rely on it being in a liquid pumpable state. To switch to hydrogen is going to take major capital investments in infrastructure. Ultimately, its cleaner, but its till not a grand leap away form combustion.
 
/ Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #29  
/ Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #30  
I think developments in lighter than air heavy lift has potential for long distance shipping in the future. Instead of venting helium in order to reduce bouyancy the helium is compressed, so issues with the ship being hard to manage on the ground are alleviated. Imagine shipping a container of your household goods cross country in a container while you relax in a stateroom. The ship could make stops, dropping off a tractor to a farmer and picking a container of produce. Emergency supplies, even portable MASH units could be delivered to disaster areas while serious cases could be medivaced out by the same ship. NY to LA could theoretically be done in 56 hours carrying 150 tons.
 
/ Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #31  
I think developments in lighter than air heavy lift has potential for long distance shipping in the future. Instead of venting helium in order to reduce bouyancy the helium is compressed, so issues with the ship being hard to manage on the ground are alleviated. Imagine shipping a container of your household goods cross country in a container while you relax in a stateroom. The ship could make stops, dropping off a tractor to a farmer and picking a container of produce. Emergency supplies, even portable MASH units could be delivered to disaster areas while serious cases could be medivaced out by the same ship. NY to LA could theoretically be done in 56 hours carrying 150 tons.

Blimps and other lighter than air craft have some major issues. One being they aren't real good in a headwind. Another being they can't fly all that high. I can't imagine a blimp flying into thunderstorms and they are too slow to fly around them. They also take a tremendous support crew and lots of preventative maintenance.

As for disaster support.... have you ever seen them try to control a blimp at ground level in the wind, let alone dock a blimp to a mooring post in the wind? Holy #$%!. If the thing is 200' long, it needs at least double that to swing around the post. And way more than double that for approach and take-off.

I just don't see them being all that cost-effective or efficient for those uses.
 
/ Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #33  
Blimps and other lighter than air craft have some major issues. One being they aren't real good in a headwind. Another being they can't fly all that high. I can't imagine a blimp flying into thunderstorms and they are too slow to fly around them. They also take a tremendous support crew and lots of preventative maintenance.

As for disaster support.... have you ever seen them try to control a blimp at ground level in the wind, let alone dock a blimp to a mooring post in the wind? Holy #$%!. If the thing is 200' long, it needs at least double that to swing around the post. And way more than double that for approach and take-off.

I just don't see them being all that cost-effective or efficient for those uses.

One of the new developments of compressing helium is that mooring masts become a thing of the past, basically the Aerostat becomes very heavy (especially with cargo) and can simply lay on the ground. These are not your daddy's Zeppelin. Here is a brief article on the technology: http://http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/aerospace/2013-06-19/aerostats-could-make-heavy-cargo-fly
 
/ Will this be tomorrow's transportation?
  • Thread Starter
#34  
Our problem with hydrogen as an energy source is that its a disruptive technology. All of our current delivery mechanisms for energy rely on it being in a liquid pumpable state. To switch to hydrogen is going to take major capital investments in infrastructure. Ultimately, its cleaner, but its till not a grand leap away form combustion.

Infrastructure is important. At first there were not very many gas stations either. Hydrogen making plants could also come into play for peak power production times or even work solely off green energy.
 
/ Will this be tomorrow's transportation?
  • Thread Starter
#35  
One of the new developments of compressing helium is that mooring masts become a thing of the past, basically the Aerostat becomes very heavy (especially with cargo) and can simply lay on the ground. These are not your daddy's Zeppelin. Here is a brief article on the technology: http://http://www.ainonline.com/aviation-news/aerospace/2013-06-19/aerostats-could-make-heavy-cargo-fly

Many years ago there was mention of developing blimps for freighters in areas such as northern Canada with no airfield or roads. The idea seemed to drop by the wayside at that time.
 
/ Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #36  
Shoot, why didn't anyone tell me, I want my free liberal arts degree now!

I think one thing important thing that hasn't been considered is reducing our dependency on foreign energy sources. The electric car is perfectly suited for this since you can drive generation from solar, natural gas(which is much cleaner than coal and currently transforming the energy generation industry), etc. Heck, I know more than a few people who run their electric cars 100% from the solar panels on their roof.

In my mind Tesla could be the modern American muscle car. You have a car designed in America, built in the US and growing the number of manufacturing jobs domestically. It's a company that has entered in incredibly difficult market and yet now builds one of the fastest production cars in the world. How can you not love a car that can put down over 1,000hp and is also a great family car(seriously they're incredibly roomy). Yes they had help from the government, but what industry hasn't? All of the things they used were available to other companies and today the ZEV credits/etc make a pretty small portion of Tesla's overall profits.

Sure, battery prices are high now but what many people don't consider is that batteries are a technology, not a resource. When economies of scale kick in they get orders of magnitude cheaper rather than more expensive due to scarcity. Just look at the price of HDTVs over the last 5 years. All of the physical components are readily available, it's the precise manufacturing process that's expensive. Just like the chip in your modern computer starts out as sand just(silicon) same with Li-Ion batteries.

To me they're a marvel of American thinking and engineering. I think that's something we could use more of these days, I'd much rather take that then companies that are moving production out of the US.

We already produce enough oil in the US to not need foreign sources anymore and have a lot more available that isn't currently cost effective to produce. The primary reason we import oil isn't that we don't have enough, it's that our refineries are setup to refine their heavier crude. EPA and other government regulations make it cheaper to continue to import and refine that oil than it would be to refit the refineries for US produced oil. Eliminate the government involvement, or at least make it more reasonable, and that would probably change.

Fuel cells are the future, this battery powered electric vehicle thing is just a middle step. Limited range with a long recharge period isn't going to be acceptable.
 
/ Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #37  
Blimps and other lighter than air craft have some major issues. One being they aren't real good in a headwind. Another being they can't fly all that high. I can't imagine a blimp flying into thunderstorms and they are too slow to fly around them. They also take a tremendous support crew and lots of preventative maintenance.

As for disaster support.... have you ever seen them try to control a blimp at ground level in the wind, let alone dock a blimp to a mooring post in the wind? Holy #$%!. If the thing is 200' long, it needs at least double that to swing around the post. And way more than double that for approach and take-off.

I just don't see them being all that cost-effective or efficient for those uses.

Had a chance to ride in the Goodyear blimp a few years back.......went all over LA and flew over the Rose Bowl two days before the game......beautiful on a calm day. You are right......takes a big landing area and a big crew.
 
/ Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #38  
/ Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #39  
Infrastructure is important. At first there were not very many gas stations either. Hydrogen making plants could also come into play for peak power production times or even work solely off green energy.

Currently the source for hydrogen is the oil pump so it's no answer until you can somehow produce hydrogen with a grid powered with cheap, clean and avaliable energy and produce hydrogen with electrolysis. I know of only one technology that has any promise for a near term solution today. It is not solar nor is it wind and it is not nuclear as we know it today.
 
/ Will this be tomorrow's transportation? #40  
Shoot, why didn't anyone tell me, I want my free liberal arts degree now!

I think one thing important thing that hasn't been considered is reducing our dependency on foreign energy sources. The electric car is perfectly suited for this since you can drive generation from solar, natural gas(which is much cleaner than coal and currently transforming the energy generation industry), etc. Heck, I know more than a few people who run their electric cars 100% from the solar panels on their roof.

In my mind Tesla could be the modern American muscle car. You have a car designed in America, built in the US and growing the number of manufacturing jobs domestically. It's a company that has entered in incredibly difficult market and yet now builds one of the fastest production cars in the world. How can you not love a car that can put down over 1,000hp and is also a great family car(seriously they're incredibly roomy). Yes they had help from the government, but what industry hasn't? All of the things they used were available to other companies and today the ZEV credits/etc make a pretty small portion of Tesla's overall profits.

Sure, battery prices are high now but what many people don't consider is that batteries are a technology, not a resource. When economies of scale kick in they get orders of magnitude cheaper rather than more expensive due to scarcity. Just look at the price of HDTVs over the last 5 years. All of the physical components are readily available, it's the precise manufacturing process that's expensive. Just like the chip in your modern computer starts out as sand just(silicon) same with Li-Ion batteries.

To me they're a marvel of American thinking and engineering. I think that's something we could use more of these days, I'd much rather take that then companies that are moving production out of the US.

You might want to look into where most of the lithium is mined. Here's a clue, it ain't here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Marketplace Items

2012 International (A59230)
2012 International...
KUBOTA MX5800 TRACTOR (A62130)
KUBOTA MX5800...
DOOSAN 7K FORKLIFT GS35-5 (A60736)
DOOSAN 7K FORKLIFT...
2016 PETERBILT 579 (A60736)
2016 PETERBILT 579...
WOOD GRABBER FOR MINI EXCAVATOR (A58214)
WOOD GRABBER FOR...
2007 LAREDO 5TH WHEEL (A60736)
2007 LAREDO 5TH...
 
Top