Pallets in fields

[blueriver]

Peefaction, is that anything like liquefaction?

Thinking ... Thinking

 

[txdon]

Here are some photos. Don't know who owns the fields but will ask around. No one sees this elsewhere? Very strange. I counted over 20 of them this morning in my travels on various properties.

Over twenty on various properties - Oh come on guys thats the BIG clue. A really BIG clue. That means there are over 40 pallets, now you get it? Notice any fences? He also travels ON various properties not BY various properties another BIG clue. I almost got it, almost almost, , ,

 

[stuckmotor]

it could very well be that they are Coyote Rest Stops. Great theory.

K0ua owns a Kioti. I think he knows more than he's letting on.

 

[blueriver]

Over twenty on various properties - Oh come on guys thats the BIG clue. A really BIG clue. That means there are over 40 pallets, now you get it? Notice any fences? He also travels ON various properties not BY various properties another BIG clue. I almost got it, almost almost, , ,

Don you get an"atta boy" your contribution with out reading the entire thread is awarded the ... Atta Boy !!!

 

[blueriver]

I'm really hitting the "post" button .. Cause you see so far nobody had shown any real evidence ... Except ... Well has anyone else set up an experiment to find out your dog peed on them .. Geez I thought I had an everyday normal dog ... Maybe I have a supernatural alien squirrel dog??

 

[smstonypoint]

That's right .. Straighten the scientist out !!! BTW nothing to report about my pallets that I set up .. Cats liked them .. Dog smelled them and then lifted his leg and peed on them .... WAIT IT JUST HIT ME !!! There are no fire hydrants in fields .. Just where the heck do wild dogs and coyotes pee ... That's it !!! What u say Steve ???

it could very well be that they are Coyote Rest Stops. Great theory.

I regret that the "History of Science" is no longer included in the core curriculum. Had you young scientists taken this course, you would have realized that this conjecture is without merit. Pythagoras addressed the question, "Does a bear go in the woods?" in 500 BC. He proved that bears and other undomesticated land-based mammals that were native to Greece indeed go in the woods. Subsequent research by his followers, the Pythagoreans, has shown that his proof is not specific to Greece, but is general, extending to all undomesticated land-based mammals with access to forests.

Also, I would remind young scientists to use scientific terminology. Rather than use the layman's term "pee," use "going number 1" or "winky tink."

Steve

 

[smstonypoint]

K0ua owns a Kioti. I think he knows more than he's letting on.

I have serious doubts about that.

Steve

 

[blueriver]

I regret that the "History of Science" is no longer included in the core curriculum. Had you young scientists taken this course, you would have realized that this conjecture is without merit. Pythagoras addressed the question, "Does a bear go in the woods?" in 500 BC. He proved that bears and other undomesticated land-based mammals that were native to Greece indeed go in the woods. Subsequent research by his followers, the Pythagoreans, has shown that his proof is not specific to Greece, but is general, extending to all undomesticated land-based mammals with access to forests. Also, I would remind young scientists to use scientific terminology. Rather than use the layman's term "pee," use "going number 1" or "winky tink." Steve

Blah Blah .. Blah .. Bears had no choice ... Till now !!! They now may very well winky tink on pallets !!!

 

[TomSeller]

I regret that the "History of Science" is no longer included in the core curriculum. Had you young scientists taken this course, you would have realized that this conjecture is without merit. Pythagoras addressed the question, "Does a bear go in the woods?" in 500 BC. He proved that bears and other land-based mammals (including humans) native to Greece indeed go in the woods. Subsequent research by his followers, the Pythagoreans, has shown that his proof is not specific to Greece, but is general, extending to all land-based mammals.

Also, I would remind young scientists to use scientific terminology. Rather than use the layman's term "pee," use "going number 1" or "winky tink."

Steve

Now that I think about it, I consider coyotes more primitive and should have used the term "urinate" when describing what was being talked about. "Winky tink" conjures up some sort of affection, not normally associated with coyotes.

 

[dave1949]

I'm really hitting the "post" button .. Cause you see so far nobody had shown any real evidence ... Except ... Well has anyone else set up an experiment to find out your dog peed on them .. Geez I thought I had an everyday normal dog ... Maybe I have a supernatural alien squirrel dog??

I have doubts about this coyote-dog pallet pinkle theory. Are we to suppose that dogs and coyotes run around with full bladders waiting for someone to provide pallets?

Your investigation hinges on determining the primary cause of the described pinkling. How will you eliminate common territorial and communicative marking from the scenario? I hope you can find a scientific method of experiment to determine the root behavior causes.

 

[RobertBrown]

I regret that the "History of Science" is no longer included in the core curriculum. Had you young scientists taken this course, you would have realized that this conjecture is without merit. Pythagoras addressed the question, "Does a bear go in the woods?" in 500 BC. He proved that bears and other undomesticated land-based mammals that were native to Greece indeed go in the woods. Subsequent research by his followers, the Pythagoreans, has shown that his proof is not specific to Greece, but is general, extending to all undomesticated land-based mammals with access to forests.

Sooo..... Pythagoras had a theory too then... eh?
Remember! He also said this.

It is better wither to be silent, or to say things of more value than silence. Sooner throw a pearl at hazard than an idle or useless word; and do not say a little in many words, but a great deal in a few.[

 

[RobertBrown]

Over twenty on various properties - Oh come on guys thats the BIG clue. A really BIG clue. That means there are over 40 pallets, now you get it? Notice any fences? He also travels ON various properties not BY various properties another BIG clue. I almost got it, almost almost, , ,

Ummmm let's see....it must be......it must be that..... Sparc is peeing on the pallets?
No..... no..... say it ain't so, txdon....say it ain't so

 

[smstonypoint]

Sooo..... Pythagoras had a theory too then... eh?
Remember! He also said this.

It is better wither to be silent, or to say things of more value than silence. Sooner throw a pearl at hazard than an idle or useless word; and do not say a little in many words, but a great deal in a few. Read more at It is better wither to be silent, or to say things of more value than silence. Sooner... - Pythagoras at BrainyQuote

The "Squirrelly Alarmists" should heed this thought from Pythagoras:

As long as man continues to be the ruthless destroyer of lower living beings he will never know health or peace. For as long as men massacre animals, they will kill each other.Pythagoras Quotes - BrainyQuote

Power to the squirrels.

Rocky

 

[RobertBrown]

Power to the squirrels.

Silence is better than unmeaning words

Pythagoras

 

[smstonypoint]

The square of the hypotenuse is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides of a right triangle.

Pythagoras

 

[RobertBrown]

Above all things, reverence yourself

Pythagoras

 

[blueriver]

I have doubts about this coyote-dog pallet pinkle theory. Are we to suppose that dogs and coyotes run around with full bladders waiting for someone to provide pallets? Your investigation hinges on determining the primary cause of the described pinkling. How will you eliminate common territorial and communicative marking from the scenario? I hope you can find a scientific method of experiment to determine the root behavior causes.

Okay tomorrow I'll set up another set a few hundred feet away to test this .. Hey at least I'm actually experimenting ...

 

[dave1949]

Okay tomorrow I'll set up another set a few hundred feet away to test this .. Hey at least I'm actually experimenting ...

I was just going to suggest "blind testing", like a blind taste test, you know. In this case, you catch a coyote and put a bag over its head.

 

[RobertBrown]

I was just going to suggest "blind testing", like a blind taste test, you know. In this case, you catch a coyote and put a bag over its head.

Try to remember....no plastic bags!
Now that I think of it, a blindfold might be better.

 

[smstonypoint]

I was just going to suggest "blind testing", like a blind taste test, you know. In this case, you catch a coyote and put a bag over its head.

I agree, but I believe that the scientific method requires "blind testing," and the "bagging" should be recorded via video. In addition, blueriver (or the executor/executrix of his estate) should post the video to this thread.

Steve