schweizer
Gold Member
Just to make clear, I'm not advocating a CT scan for screening purposes. The CT coronary angiogram that I was referring to above is quite complicated, needs top-of-the-line equipment with specially trained technologists, lots of post-processing on the computer, and you won't find it for $300. It's been discussed for certain high risk patients.
A nuclear medicine stress test is a great tool, decent price, low risk, and it shows physiologically what is happening in the heart with reasonable accuracy. As some of you are noting, none of these tests are perfect.
What worries many in my field are those low cost scans that rsewill mentions. So far, the ones I've seen are "comprehensive" ultrasound screenings for a great "deal" of $xxx. What you refer to I suspect is just a limited non-contrast scan done in a trailer by a company that travels from town to town, like the ultrasound deal. What often happens is they send you or your primary care provider a report that says something like, "Non-specific small subcentimeter pulmonary nodule." (Most often an old benign granuloma, rarely a developing cancer.) What do you do with that? Now you bought yourself expensive follow up scans. Those cheap advertised scans cause more problems than find bad things, statistically speaking. Of course, there will be the anecdotal testimonials. Save your money. A checkup at the doctor's office is cheaper.
Marcus
A nuclear medicine stress test is a great tool, decent price, low risk, and it shows physiologically what is happening in the heart with reasonable accuracy. As some of you are noting, none of these tests are perfect.
What worries many in my field are those low cost scans that rsewill mentions. So far, the ones I've seen are "comprehensive" ultrasound screenings for a great "deal" of $xxx. What you refer to I suspect is just a limited non-contrast scan done in a trailer by a company that travels from town to town, like the ultrasound deal. What often happens is they send you or your primary care provider a report that says something like, "Non-specific small subcentimeter pulmonary nodule." (Most often an old benign granuloma, rarely a developing cancer.) What do you do with that? Now you bought yourself expensive follow up scans. Those cheap advertised scans cause more problems than find bad things, statistically speaking. Of course, there will be the anecdotal testimonials. Save your money. A checkup at the doctor's office is cheaper.
Marcus