arrow
Super Member
It's just not even something to bring up, for or against the original argument.
.
Unbelievable. If you were trying to move a tree out of the road and Archimedes came up and said "give me a long enough lever and a place to stand and I'll move the earth" Would you say. "what's that got to do with this tree"? and then berate him and call him a clown for making the statement? The op asked if the rim guard would leak out with more pressure. I said no so he could fill the tire with more air and perhaps seal the leak w/o worry about "air pressure" if indeed the tire had insufficient air to retain bead to rim causing the leak. Knowing that Archimedes never could move the earth fell in the same vein that I knew no amount of air would influence the rim guard so do not be afraid to add air. That was my original suggestion and if the rim wasn't bent or had something lodged between bead and rim, it was the simplest and used a freakin analogy to ease concern if the op had any.
I realize that a man in your position would be more literal, exact minded and mathematical in his approach to things but you should not apply that mindset to my analogy or perhaps any analogy for that matter.
Last edited: