2005 Kubota FEL and BH FAIR DEAL ?

   / 2005 Kubota FEL and BH FAIR DEAL ? #31  
Something to consider that I did not see mentioned in the previous posts.

The L3700 is somewhat limited compared to the lower HP L3130. The lift capacity on the L3700 LA463 is significantly less than the LA723 on the L3130. The 3-pt lift is much lower. Only the smaller backhoe will fit on the L3700 and lists for $7,448 plus the 16" bucket is another $648. Is a mid PTO available on the L3700? There is no mention of it in the "Build my own" feature on Kubota's web site. The OP should consider how important these are.
 
Last edited:
   / 2005 Kubota FEL and BH FAIR DEAL ? #33  
:confused2:

http://www.tractorbynet.com/forums/john-deere-buying-pricing/200208-john-deere-4105-used-cost.html

More problems ..... local dealer has this , and it was sweet ! :licking:

I hope the mods , do not kick me off for being SO mixed up on what to buy

theres no harm in taking your time reserching an looking at tractors.your the 1 that will be running it.i looked at tractors for 10 months before i bought 1.i went with a buddy to tend to some business an we stopped an looked at disc mowers an tractors.i had no intenion of buying a tractor,but before we came home we went back to the dealers an i got his prices.then the next morning i called them an started making a deal for the tractor.
 
   / 2005 Kubota FEL and BH FAIR DEAL ?
  • Thread Starter
#34  
Looked at JD 4105 again :licking: , its BIG , but like new !!! Been thinking ALL day , I am ONLY going to buy a L3400 or larger . I must have HST :thumbsup:. So I guess I am going to keep looking . :confused2: Thanks for all the HELP :thumbsup:
 
   / 2005 Kubota FEL and BH FAIR DEAL ? #35  
Just remember HP alone does not mean squat and nothing but noisy RPM's. Without torque its useless.
 
   / 2005 Kubota FEL and BH FAIR DEAL ? #36  
Just remember HP alone does not mean squat and nothing but noisy RPM's. Without torque its useless.

Your statement doesn't make much sense:confused2:

HP and torque go hand in hand. They are a function of eachother and the RPM's.

And since most diesels in the tractors he is looking at max at ~3000rpm's, I think it's fair to say that a tractor with a similar HP rating will also have a similar torque rating.

And the statement "without torque, HP is useless" is bassackwards:laughing:
For starters, you cannot have HP without torque. So whatever HP you have, you have torque avaliable.

BUT torque is useless without HP. You can apply ALL the torque in the world, but if you dont have HP, it means it ain't a moving, and no work is getting done.

Either way though, I dont think this argument applys to the OP's search for a tractor and is going to accomplis absolutly nothing:confused2:
 
   / 2005 Kubota FEL and BH FAIR DEAL ?
  • Thread Starter
#37  
Hp and torque must get to the ground , 4x4 and loader tires will make a huge difference . I just do not want to buy to small and have to over rev it everytime I drive it . My buddy has a L2800 , 4x4 and he pulls 6 ft box blade , he says , Just gas on it , it will pull it . I would like to have extra hp , so 35-40 hp should work for 6 ft equipment
 
   / 2005 Kubota FEL and BH FAIR DEAL ? #38  
Your statement doesn't make much sense:confused2:

HP and torque go hand in hand. They are a function of eachother and the RPM's.

And since most diesels in the tractors he is looking at max at ~3000rpm's, I think it's fair to say that a tractor with a similar HP rating will also have a similar torque rating.

And the statement "without torque, HP is useless" is bassackwards:laughing:
For starters, you cannot have HP without torque. So whatever HP you have, you have torque avaliable.

BUT torque is useless without HP. You can apply ALL the torque in the world, but if you dont have HP, it means it ain't a moving, and no work is getting done.

Either way though, I dont think this argument applys to the OP's search for a tractor and is going to accomplis absolutly nothing:confused2:

You can have HP with MUCH LESS torque. A diesel truck with with 325 HP and 525 pounds of torque will out pull a engine with 400 HP and 300 pounds of torque.

If you actually find the ratings on the tractor engines you will find that some rated with the same HP will have different torque ratings and that it the defining difference. It is a balance of the two but that is why the old heavy tractors of old with low HP but lots of torque can pull.

You can kid yourself all you want but it is applied physics. The manufactures stay away from this as to not to confuse people who don't understand and to also sell what seems to be more power when in reality it is not necessarily. RPM's is where the engine develops its relative power band. That is often the defining difference in reaching peak power on a 3 cylinder vs 4 cylinder engine and the TORQUE they will deliver.

On average the same HP engines on a Kubota will often exceed the torque ratings on other manufacturers. I have not done an exhaustive study on all of them but the ones I did research that is what came to me through the specs provided.

There is nothing bassackwards about any of this, you just need to understand engines, physics and the value of more torque.

That 3130 will have more torque and less HP than the L3700 but would still out pull it. Take or leave it.
 
   / 2005 Kubota FEL and BH FAIR DEAL ? #39  
You are vastly underestimating my knowledge of engines, torque, applied physics, etc.

You can have HP with MUCH LESS torque. A diesel truck with with 325 HP and 525 pounds of torque will out pull a engine with 400 HP and 300 pounds of torque.

True, but if an engine is making 400HP and only 300Ft-lbs, it has to be spinning much higher RPM's, like a gasser. And comparing a gas motor to a diesel is like comparing apples to oranges. And for the sake of CUT talk, they are mostly ALL diesels and only spin to ~3000rpm MAX.

If you actually find the ratings on the tractor engines you will find that some rated with the same HP will have different torque ratings and that it the defining difference. It is a balance of the two but that is why the old heavy tractors of old with low HP but lots of torque can pull.Right conclusion, wrong reason. For starters, the only way a engine (older tractor) can have lower HP and higher torque is if it is a slower spinning engine. These newer diesels make their peak power at ~2700-3000RPM. Old iron is ~2000-2300rpm. So two tractors with the same HP, but one of them rated at a lower RPM is going to have more torque. And a 30HP tractor of yesteryear can pull so much better than a 30HP today has a lot to do with the 38" tires and MUCH more weight. Compared to our current lightweights and smaller tires.

You can kid yourself all you want but it is applied physics. The manufactures stay away from this as to not to confuse people who don't understand and to also sell what seems to be more power when in reality it is not necessarily. RPM's is where the engine develops its relative power band. That is often the defining difference in reaching peak power on a 3 cylinder vs 4 cylinder engine and the TORQUE they will deliver.

On average the same HP engines on a Kubota will often exceed the torque ratings on other manufacturers. I have not done an exhaustive study on all of them but the ones I did research that is what came to me through the specs provided. I disagree. All of these modern diesels are very comparable in similar HP sizes. As mentioned earlier, the only way for an engine "in general" to have more torque than another if the HP is the same, is for that engine to be a slower RPM engine. So basically waht you are sayine is that kubotas in general turn slower RPM's. And this is not always the case.

There is nothing bassackwards about any of this, you just need to understand engines, physics and the value of more torque.Your statement I qouted WAS bassakwards. Simple physics. In your statement, you said "HP alone does not mean squat" Well, you CANNOT have HP alone. If you have HP, you have TQ. And then you said "without TQ, it is useless" Well, again, you simply cannot have HP without TQ. But a correct saying would be without HP, torque is useless. Because you can apply all the torque in the world, but if you arent creating HP, things are moving and getting done.

That 3130 will have more torque and less HP than the L3700 but would still out pull it. Take or leave it. Simply wrong here as well. It would be near impossible for the 3130 to have more TQ unless there is some really strange things going on under the curve. Lets look at the facts. For starters, BOTH engines are rated @ 2700RPM MAX. The 3130 is a 3cyl, 91.5 CU IN, 31HP The L3700 is a 111.4 CU IN, 37HP. So how is it that the L3130 is making more torque??????Yes, more than likely the 3130 will outpull the L3700, but it is because it is about 600lbs heavier, NOT because it has more torque.

In all reality, With the gearing in tractors of all generations, they have the ability to transfer more torque to the ground than traction avaliable. So torque really isnt an issue. My tractor could have 500ft-lbs more torque, but there is now way I would be able to make use of it. That is why MFG's dont get hung up on it.

But HP IS important. For things like PTO driven implements. Because Standard PTO is 540 RPM For ALL tractors. using that 540RPM AND the rated PTO HP, we can easialy calculate the PTO torque if you so choose. But two tractors making the SAME PTO HP, will have the SAME PTO torque when it is spinning at its rated 540 PRM. So when comparing tractors, it does no good to know both, because if HP is the same at the PTO, torque will be the same as well.
 
   / 2005 Kubota FEL and BH FAIR DEAL ? #40  
Then explain why my Farmall cub cub with HP rating of 10HP can pull my landscape trailer with 1200 to 1500 pounds no sweat but my 24HP craftsman lawn tractor will burn out if I try and pull 500 with it. Both gas engines. The Briggs on that Craftsman won't do it because of the absence its torque capability or if you want to say less power. If I put that 24hp Briggs on that Cub it might work for a few hours if geared accordingly but will be toast in no time. Once again, both gas engines, so splain it to me Lucy, how can that be?

The only time HP meets torque is at 5250 RPM's. Way below these engines capabilities.

Torque is the static measurement of how much work an engine does, while power is a measure of how fast the work is being done. Since horsepower is calculated from torque, what we are all seeking is the greatest-possible torque value over the broadest-possible rpm range. Horsepower will follow suit, and it will fall in the engine speed range dictated by the many factors that affect the torque curve.

Engine designs are what go into all this. The cylinder size and bore and stroke lengths start to Both come into play. It's not all about "HP" IMO. It is about what the engine can do.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2015 Ram 1500 Crew Cab Pickup Truck (A49461)
2015 Ram 1500 Crew...
2008 24ft. Haulmark Edge T/A Enclosed Trailer (A49461)
2008 24ft...
2005 Sterling Acterra Tender Truck (A51039)
2005 Sterling...
2017 Ford Fusion Sedan (A50324)
2017 Ford Fusion...
2015 FORD F-250XL SUPER DUTY TRUCK (A51406)
2015 FORD F-250XL...
TMA (A49461)
TMA (A49461)
 
Top