I dont think a cab is such a good idea on a CUT. They usually dont have too much hp to spare which limits the effectiveness of the AC (or remaining power to do real work). Also, the cab is usually too high to fit in std 7 ft doors and makes it tough mowing around trees and such. That said though, I really like a good canopy which is nearly as comfortable under the hot sun as an AC cab. I like cabs on big tractors and would much rather have one on those, but no way would I want one on a CUT. Usually the big tractor dont fit in a 7 ft door even without a cab, and the power draw for a good AC is insignificant with larger engines.
I wouldn't say Kubota is a better tractor, but both are good tractors. Yes the Kubota will hold its resale better, but a cab is a expensive option and the Kubota would be much higher priced if it had a factory installed cab with heat, AC, and Stereo. You should consider if the cab will be in the way with your intended use and if it is, the TYM 433 is also available without a cab and should save you a few thousand, if you go that way. Any how compare the specs on the two tractors and make your decision, and good luck with it.
...Kubota is in a class by itself...
Builder, while I too respect your opinion, I simply can't accept it. .
What makes more sense? A new kubota grand L3940 GST with loader or a new TYM 433 with loader AND cab, both can be had for the same price. This new tractor decision is so confusing.
I dont think a cab is such a good idea on a CUT. They usually dont have too much hp to spare which limits the effectiveness of the AC (or remaining power to do real work). Also, the cab is usually too high to fit in std 7 ft doors and makes it tough mowing around trees and such. That said though, I really like a good canopy which is nearly as comfortable under the hot sun as an AC cab. I like cabs on big tractors and would much rather have one on those, but no way would I want one on a CUT. Usually the big tractor dont fit in a 7 ft door even without a cab, and the power draw for a good AC is insignificant with larger engines.
Hey, I'm good with that. I can't accept your's, either, but we can still get along. To me, that's all that matters.
My logic behind Kubota is in a class alone in that size segment is because their sales & success in that segment supports my opinion.
Your side of the story has its' merits. That's why I bought a used Challenger instead of a comparable used Kubota. I just couldn't afford that extra Kubota resale value!!!
BTW: I bought my Challenger in Western New York!! Up your way!
Ditto!
Hey, I like them Agco products. I was all decided on a MF1240 a number of years ago. In my opinion, at that time, spec for spec, nobody offered the same standard equipment for comparable cash. The CFO kind of shot that idea down then, and I haven't been able to propose a strong enough business case to persuade her since.
(Actually, the 1220 probably would have been a better size, but don't tell her that.)