"Construction Attachments" 4 in 1 bucket

/ "Construction Attachments" 4 in 1 bucket #3  
Builder, I have had that same model and size 4-in-1 bucket on my L39 since it was new (~800 hrs).The only difference is mine has a bolt on cutting edge on the bucket. It has been indestructable despite my best efforts. It is easy to use and service. CA's customer service is about the best I have seen. I give it " two thumbs up" based on my experience.
 
Last edited:
/ "Construction Attachments" 4 in 1 bucket #4  
I bought a set of their pallet forks and gave them a pretty good workout, popping a few good size rocks out of the ground. Decent quality equipment for the money and I found CA real easy to work with.

I'd buy from them again.

-John
 
/ "Construction Attachments" 4 in 1 bucket #5  
I also have one of their pallet forks. Great price and good quality. I plan to make a "man lift" to use them with.
 
/ "Construction Attachments" 4 in 1 bucket #6  
/ "Construction Attachments" 4 in 1 bucket #7  
I do not know first hand, but in my research for a 4-in-1 I found these to be of top notch quality and was not exceeded by anyone else.
 
/ "Construction Attachments" 4 in 1 bucket #8  
It is neat to read the great reviews about Construction Attachments products. The owner Charles Corriher is my brother, and we have their full line of products available for purchase online at our website EverythingAttachments.com along with free shipping to the lower 48 states!

I have to say, it is very rare that we get any complaints about the quality of the attachments they produce, and our customers put them through the ringer on a regular basis.
 
/ "Construction Attachments" 4 in 1 bucket
  • Thread Starter
#9  
It is neat to read the great reviews about Construction Attachments products. The owner Charles Corriher is my brother, and we have their full line of products available for purchase online at our website EverythingAttachments.com along with free shipping to the lower 48 states!

I have to say, it is very rare that we get any complaints about the quality of the attachments they produce, and our customers put them through the ringer on a regular basis.

I think I spoke with you over the weekend!

I'm trying to decide between your 4 in 1 and a lightly used Woods 4 in 1 bucket I found. The woods is ~100 lbs heavier (644 lbs) than yours. Your's is more expensive, but the shipping is free. The Woods is considerably cheaper ($1,200), but I have to ship it 1/2 way across the country. :eek: that's not cheap.....looks like ~$500 yeouch! :eek:
 
/ "Construction Attachments" 4 in 1 bucket #10  
I was looking at 4 in 1 buckets and thought I really wanted one. Then I tried it out and was very disappointed with it. One was on a newer New Holland full sized backhoe, and the other was on a Case backhoe that was about five years old. Both functioned perfectly, but I found it very hard to judge how much the bucket was open and to know exactly where I was at when picking up branches and stumps.

Both guys told me that you get better at it with practice, and they both licked their 4 in 1 buckets, but the longer I was there, the more they admitted to things that they didn't care for. They have both bent their buckets while trying to carry trees. If you have a tree that's long and sticking out way past the sides of the bucket, you can very quickly bend the bucket. One guy did it twice, the other did it once.

The best part of it is the ability to move dirt and pick up something with out having to get off of the seat or change anything. But for moving allot of debris, it's not very good. It's hard to pick up odd shapes. Branches tend to only be held in place at one point and will twist around on you. It just doesn't get a good hold of what you are trying to carry and it's not uncommon to drop stuff.

After that, I went back to looking at root grapples. I changed everything over to a skid steer universal quick attach system, which I don't recommend for full sized loader/backhoes, but I learned that lesson the hard way. There are other systems that are better and stronger. I can switch from the grapple to the bucket in just a few minutes. I haven't timed myself, but thing 15 minutes is about right. It really depends on how hard the hydraulic hoses are to get apart. They are my biggest challenge.

With my grapple, I can pick up just about anything and carry it as far as I need. I have to grapples on it, so each one closes until it's solid. If I have a stump on one side and a thin tree on the other, it doesn't matter. That feature alone should be a must on any grapple system. I've had brush piles that the grapple on one side almost seems like it's still wide open, while the grapple on the other side is half closed to get a tight hold on what I'm carrying.

The real test is that my 70 year old dad can use it and was able to figure it out almost instantly. He's a heck of a worker, but doesn't handle new things very well. With this, he can clear land all day long and not break anything. I had allot of fear with him and a 4 in 1 bucket. Especially when I learned of how easily they can be bent.

Good luck,
Eddie
 
/ "Construction Attachments" 4 in 1 bucket #11  
I made the decision not to buy a 4n1 for most of the same reason's that Eddie mentioned. But, for occasional grapple use, occasional dozer use and the ease to go from one use to another - they're a very good "compromise" implement.

Most of the utility companies around here use 'em. They fit the bill if you're not gonna use them for a grapple for a majority of the time.

AKfish
 
/ "Construction Attachments" 4 in 1 bucket #12  
I like my 4-n-1.

I have a separate grapple, which is what I put on for big grapple jobs, but the advantage of the 4-n-1 is that it is always available without changing buckets when I need it for just one log.

The ability to drop the open bucket over a stump, post, or sapling and then pull straight up is very convenient.

Sort of like the screwdriver blade on a Swiss Army knife -- not a real screwdriver but good enough for a lot of jobs and always there.
 
/ "Construction Attachments" 4 in 1 bucket #13  
I find I use mine opened up a lot for pushing stuff. For me about the only thing you can't do with a 4in1 verses a regular bucket is carry water in it. I like the versatility it gives. I also have a separate grapple.
 
/ "Construction Attachments" 4 in 1 bucket #14  
I think that a lot of people try to use 4 in 1s for stuff that I think that they were never intended for. They are not a grapple and for anyone to think that they are is foolish. As has been said time and time again, the right tool for the job just can not be beat. We all make do if we don't have the right tool or don't have the time to hook up the right tool, but that should not be held against the tool that we were improperly using. I guess what I'm saying is that you should not bad mouth something when your experience with it was short and not for the intended use. Not that any of this helps anybody, but I have seen several machines with these buckets used for grading and for demo cleanup, and to me they looked to work very well for what they were being used for.

Just my opinion, and not intended towards anyone.
 
/ "Construction Attachments" 4 in 1 bucket #15  
I have both grapple and 4n1 and I agree with the several posters who have outlined the limitations of the 4n1. It is a Swiss Army knife implement...decent at many things but great at none. I've come away thinking of it as a very useful tool for someone in the construction business who needs the all purpose FEL implement at a construction site where they don't have a lot of other implements handy. For a "home" CUT owner who is usually pretty close by to his grapple, bucket, box blade, rake etc the 4n1 is not so critical and as they are very expensive, very heavy and rather vulnerable to abuse, I have come to appreciate mine as a luxury item, not a necessary tool. Best use for mine is to have it on the loader when I am using my backhoe to dig stumps. I can move the stump out of the hole, fill the hole and then pick the stump up again to take it to the burn pile etc without changing implements or trying to fill a hole with a grapple:eek:. Otherwise I find I'd rather than the grapple or regular bucket mounted.
 
/ "Construction Attachments" 4 in 1 bucket #17  
What is the reason that you would rather have your regular bucket on instead of the 4in1?

Larger capacity and weighs less and has replaceable cutting edge. I don't mean to imply that I would specifically change out the 4n1 for the regular bucket very often if the 4n1 was already attached but those are the advantages of the regular bucket (in addition to cost). I should note that my regular bucket is 72 inch while my 4n1 is about six inches smaller.
 
/ "Construction Attachments" 4 in 1 bucket #18  
Larger capacity and weighs less and has replaceable cutting edge. I don't mean to imply that I would specifically change out the 4n1 for the regular bucket very often if the 4n1 was already attached but those are the advantages of the regular bucket (in addition to cost). I should note that my regular bucket is 72 inch while my 4n1 is about six inches smaller.

Ok, thanks for the reply.
 
/ "Construction Attachments" 4 in 1 bucket #19  
It is neat to read the great reviews about Construction Attachments products.

The first 4-in-1 I put on a compact tractor was a new CA. It was a very
stoutly built product. So count this as another positive review. The only
issue I had was that it was so heavy that the tractor (a Kubota L2550DT)
lost half its loader lift capacity.

Recently I put a WRLong light duty 4-in-1 on my Kioti. It weighs over
200# less than the CA. It works very well, but I have to be careful
not to damage it, and I don't like the non-greasable clevis on the
lower cylinder pivot.

Ted, I notice that most 4-in-1s seem to come from N. Carolina. What's
up with that?
 
/ "Construction Attachments" 4 in 1 bucket #20  
The first 4-in-1 I put on a compact tractor was a new CA. It was a very
stoutly built product. So count this as another positive review. The only
issue I had was that it was so heavy that the tractor (a Kubota L2550DT)
lost half its loader lift capacity.

Recently I put a WRLong light duty 4-in-1 on my Kioti. It weighs over
200# less than the CA. It works very well, but I have to be careful
not to damage it, and I don't like the non-greasable clevis on the
lower cylinder pivot.

Ted, I notice that most 4-in-1s seem to come from N. Carolina. What's
up with that?

Your experiences show the Achilles Heel(s) of the 4n1 on a CUT. If they are light then they are vulnerable to damage (especially with bulldozing) and if they are heavily built then they weigh a ton and cut your lift capacity. 4n1 buckets make sense on powerful construction loaders but on CUTs have considerable limitations as well as being expensive.
 
 
 
Top