I guess my uninformed understanding of radials is about right. I always thought the point of a radial is that it changes shape as it rotates. In other words the point contacting the ground expands into an 'oval-ish' shape to provide a bigger contact patch. A bias-ply, on the other hand, pretty much maintains its shape throughout rotation. So, the radial requires a specific design in the sidewall to allow for this change in shape and to handle the heat associated with it. If any of this is correct, it stands to reason that a 'radial' tube, would need to have some of the same properties.
However, it seems that on large slow moving tires, like a tractor, it wouldn't be that much of a factor. Do the radial tubes cost much more?
Finally, what, exactly is the primary benefit of radial tractor tires? Someone mentioned longer wear. Why? It seems to me that would be a compound issue. And if they do 'flex' radially like a car tire is supposed to, can you see it? Does it really provide a greater footprint? Just wondering because the major tire web sites are really pushing these radials hard and they are way more expensive.
For my mixed use, which involves a lot of work in woods with brush stobs etc, unless the radials provide significantly more punture/cut resistant side walls, they wouldn't make much sense for me. If I rip the sidewall out of my bias tire, it will cost a lot less to replace...I'm assuming. (And I have ripped the sidewall out of one of my truck tires (radials) before.)