RK manuals.

[cmexrayu]

Does anyone else here think that the RK owners manuals are kinda terrible?

 

[gunny0628]

I don’t, but then again I’m pretty new to tractors.

 

[markie61]

Does anyone else here think that the RK owners manuals are kinda terrible?

I've been through them three times. Clearly, they originally were written in Korean and only adequately translated by a non-English-as-a-primary-language translator - grammatical/punctuation errors, as well as poor thesaurus-inspired word choices (e.g., draft control: "...by mounting the lever forward, the depth increase." In addition, the information is often incomplete; for instance, it would have been nice to know the Load Sense was disabled when Auto Throttle is engaged.

 

[snymat68]

The manuals are definitely lacking in their current form. I know RK is working with TYM to improve them. hopefully this end up being a "complete overhaul" and doesn't take much longer.

 

[Grumpycat]

Does anyone else here think that the RK owners manuals are kinda terrible?

I didn't think the RK74 manual was all that bad. A few places the grammar lacked.

However, after digging through the manual I still didn't know if the tractor had a DPF. There is a search hit for DPF discussing oil change frequency but nothing about whether the engine needs to regenerate the DPF, or a defeat to delay if the tractor is in an enclosed space.