One of the reasons front blowers are expensive is that the subframe underneath, that the snowblower is mounted to in the front, is made heavy enough to transfer the blows a front implement encounters to the drawbar in the back. It is usually made to take front blades, brooms, and other front mounted devices.... not just the blower. They also require a added gearbox. A front blower is basically the same as a rear blower. The additional gear box allows the front driveshaft to connect at a lower angle than having to be connected in the same plane as the center of the fan, and the blower being able to be mounted closer to the tractor as a result. And, this gearbox can allow a bigger fan, the thing that does all the work. Plus the ' we can charge more for the stuff you really want ' thing. A rear blower is just mounted to the 3pt. To me, the second best option is a rear facing blower. It will handle big drifts/banks and usually is not that big a deal if your operator area is big enough/designed to let you sit a little side saddle. The rear pull are popular for contractors in residential areas because they can back in and blow out... then on to the next driveway. They have less to deal with close to the house. And, they are all about doing lots of drives faster for more money coming in. For me, the rear pull would be sort of useless. We get big snows that you would struggle to drive thru, let alone dragging a implement behind you while doing so. And every few years we get big drifting. But for lots of folks, the rear pull is OK. Erskine makes a front blower that is not tractor dependent, one which you can use on various makes, in case you are thinking of possibly changing tractors in the future.