Chipper PTO Chipper Decision

[jloven]

I know there have been a couple of threads on this topic in the past, but I needs some advice on the best PTO Chipper. I will doing various chipping tasks with it and want one that can chip the small stuff up to 6" and that will last over time. Will not be using it everyday of course, but I don't want to have to trade out after a few years of use.
I have looked at the OXXN and Woodmaxx versus the Wallenstein 62 and Salsco 624 and 627 units. I have a JD 3720 with power beyond installed, so I think I can run any of them without much issue. It really comes down to the $$$, it looks like I can get a new OXXN or Woodmaxx with Hydraulic feed for $2700 or so shipped to my front door. I have found a used Wallenstein 62 and Salscos 624 and 627's. My question is would it be better to get the OXXN / Woodmaxx new with hydraulic feed or go with Wallenstein / Salsco without? Any owners of OXXN / Woodmaxx comments on their experiences would be appreciated. From video and pics, it looks like the wallenstein / Salscos chip faster and are more durable??? Thanks

 

[Steppenwolfe]

I have the Woodmaxx 8 inch hydraulic. It works like rented mule, and I have zero complaints. It is a very nice machine.View attachment 360595

 

[LouieJunior]

I also have the 8 inch Woodmaxx chipper with self contained hydraulic feed. Can not testify to a long life, because I have only had it for one year, but I'm very happy with it so far.

 

[tman1020]

i have the jima (china made) 6 inch. its more like 7 or 7/12 and is a work horse. for the price its great but quality sucks. i have had to rebuild the self feed drive line out of heaver material. i know this sounds like a big deal but it was not. its a farily simple deisgn and pritty basic. i needed a chipper for one long term job and found a deal on this one (was the only chpper i could find at the time). i think they r like 1500.00 and if u r handy and are not using it often might be the way to go.. how ever cant beat american made and im sure worth the price difference for long term use would prob go that route if i were to do again.

 

[newbury]

It really comes down to the $$$

Well I was waiting for someone else to bring up the Jinma.

When I look at the manual Woodmaxx pics online it very closely resembles a Jinma with upgraded 3pt, chute and an additional bearing.

I bought the Jinma.

http://www.tractorbynet.com/forums/attachments/277284-jinma-8-chipper-first-hours-2.html

From what I've read if you want one to work reliably for a very long time go with a Wally.

But for me $$$ were very important so I went with the Jinma.

 

[Septemberwheat]

I have a Wallenstein, it's awesome!

 

[tractchores]

I looked at a bunch of brands before buying the wallenstein. The chinese ones while cheaper all seemed to have quality issues and people often customized them before being happy. I got the wallenstein because I wanted something that would be safe, work immediately and be bullet proof for a long time. I bought used, which helped on the price. If I were you I'd try to see if I could try one out, I don't think on the wallenstein that you need the hydro feed. It should self feed very well just due to the blades. They also have a wider feed opening so you don't need to trim very much. I love mine and get a LOT of use out of it.

 

[jloven]

Well after a ton of research and stress, I pulled the trigger today and ordered a WoodMaxx Hydraulic chipper. I really liked the looks and durability of the Salsco line, but just could not justify over twice the cost of a Woodmaxx for my residential needs. I found a couple of used Wallenstein's but they were not in great shape and I really think the hydraulic feed is a necessity based on what others have told me within the TractorbyNet group. Each time I started to go a different direction, I always came back to the woodmaxx due to the reviews of the members here, the low cost, customer service, and a getting a 3 year warranty.
One thing is for sure, good quality used chippers are hard to find in my area (North Carolina). The Woodmaxx should be here in 10 days or so, just in time to get started on the spring clean up projects...

 

[Jack Yuan]

Well after a ton of research and stress, I pulled the trigger today and ordered a WoodMaxx Hydraulic chipper. I really liked the looks and durability of the Salsco line, but just could not justify over twice the cost of a Woodmaxx for my residential needs. I found a couple of used Wallenstein's but they were not in great shape and I really think the hydraulic feed is a necessity based on what others have told me within the TractorbyNet group. Each time I started to go a different direction, I always came back to the woodmaxx due to the reviews of the members here, the low cost, customer service, and a getting a 3 year warranty.
One thing is for sure, good quality used chippers are hard to find in my area (North Carolina). The Woodmaxx should be here in 10 days or so, just in time to get started on the spring clean up projects...

one question for you, between used wally and new woodmaxx, which one you will choose?

 

[oosik]

When I had my original tractor - 22hp ford - I had a Wallenstein 42. Now with my Kubota M6040 I have the Wally 62. Neither chipper had hydraulic feed and quite honestly I've never seen the need for hyd in-feed. Both chippers grabbed the material so aggressively it is almost frightening. I NEVER have to prune any branches off any trees to get them to feed properly into either chipper. I've had Wallenstein chippers now for over ten years and never had a moments problem with either. I know there must be a good reason for the hydraulic in-feed system but for the life of me I surely can not figure why anybody needs it.

 

[RalphVa]

If you'd be happy with one that only does 3 to 3 1/2", the McKissic TPH-122 is a good one. I've had mine since about 2005. Have rotated the hammers twice, a piece of cake, and have had the chipper blade sharpened a number of times (take it to the local hardware store that sends it to a machine shop). Had to replace the one (out of 4) bearings, the only one not zerk lubed. Again, an easy job. It seems very light weight, and it is, but the hammer assembly is very heavy duty. Had a similar design Troy Bilt that did not have a good hammer design. The spacers would get all beat to ****. Hammer rotation was a 3 or 4 hour job vs. about 15 minutes on the Mac.

Pretty sure that MacKissic makes the equipment for DR.

Ralph

 

[DB Pilot]

I have the wallenstein 42. Have had no problems or had to rebuild or replace any part of it. To me that speaks volumes about its durability. I have had jams trying to put wood over 4" into it but that is my fault. It is easy to clear jams with two bolts at bottom of feed chute. After shutting down of course. Everything oosik said is true for me too. Hydraulic feed ? not needed.
One thing, if I put to many leafy branches in it will clog, easily remedied by going light with leaves and more with branches.

 

[pinetree10]

The Woodmaxx looks nice and it's good to see that it's made in New York. Let us know what the quality is like. I bought a Wallenstein and it's worked great for me. I'll take Canadian made over China made any day. I needed a relatively compact unit to fit well with my 2720 and my 24x24 garage and the BX42 was a great fit on both counts. It's nice being able to fold up the chute while it's in storage. I've used mechanical feed commercial units and they're great because you don't necessarily have to prune limbs before feeding them into the chute. That being said, the design of the Wallenstein chute and knives draws branches in anyway. Buy good quality and you'll always be happy with it, even if it costs you a few bucks.