(Sorry in advance for long-post, I have tried to add as much info I can to get some help from the experts here!)
I'm very new here to the forum & hoping to get my 1st CUT this weekend (May Sales Events end this weekend).
I need some help deciding between my 2 last contenders in my search;
Kubota B2601, HST, FEL, 1,600# tractor weight
or
Massey Ferguson 1726E, HST, FEL, 2,600# tractor weight.
Both packages will also have Tiller-50" & Box Blade-60".
The Kubota is a small-frame 'B' & the Massey is sized more like a series-3 (in JD-speak).
The Massey is physically larger, much heavier & the hydraulics are somewhat better.
Here are my uses.
Central NY location, 7 acres, 2 as lawn, rest as woodlot, heavy clay soil here (right now it's a swamp due to all the recent rain), have some slopes to deal with; walk-out-basement & a pond close to the house.
Main purposes for CUT: need to rototill the perimeter of my property (some sidehilling included) as a tick barrier (this year has been bad). Also use Box Blade to maintain my 150' long gravel driveway & to create a new gravel driveway to get equipment from house frontage to barn out back. The FEL will be used for typical material moving, landscape improving, winter snowbanks (have ATV w/blade & snowblower for regular drive clearing). FEL and/or 3PH will be needed to move large rocks.
I have plans for adding either a 3rd function or rear remote. My next implement will most likely be a grapple (lots of woodlot work with this).
I have a GT for mowing, so this CUT will never see lawn mowing duty.
Where I am hung-up is due to the difference in weight between these two units; the K-2601 weighs 1,600#, the MF-1726E weighs 2,600#, substantially more. I agree no one usually complains about buying 'too-large' of a tractor, but between the soft lawns in the spring & fall, I wonder if the extra 1,000# Massey would not be able to be driven over any lawns for some time. Right now my 700# GT is leaving wet trails when I mow. I realize this spring is atypical with the amount of rain & being clay once the rain stops for a while my soil will harden up like concrete. Also, working the woodlot, I wonder if the larger, longer tractor might feel like a 'bull-in-a-china-shop'.
So given the type of work, the nature of the property & usage, does anything really ring out to you with similar properties/equipment experiences? Is there any down-side to having a tractor that might be a bit big/heavy for the property?
Any insights would be very much appreciated - thanks for taking the time to read this!
I'm very new here to the forum & hoping to get my 1st CUT this weekend (May Sales Events end this weekend).
I need some help deciding between my 2 last contenders in my search;
Kubota B2601, HST, FEL, 1,600# tractor weight
or
Massey Ferguson 1726E, HST, FEL, 2,600# tractor weight.
Both packages will also have Tiller-50" & Box Blade-60".
The Kubota is a small-frame 'B' & the Massey is sized more like a series-3 (in JD-speak).
The Massey is physically larger, much heavier & the hydraulics are somewhat better.
Here are my uses.
Central NY location, 7 acres, 2 as lawn, rest as woodlot, heavy clay soil here (right now it's a swamp due to all the recent rain), have some slopes to deal with; walk-out-basement & a pond close to the house.
Main purposes for CUT: need to rototill the perimeter of my property (some sidehilling included) as a tick barrier (this year has been bad). Also use Box Blade to maintain my 150' long gravel driveway & to create a new gravel driveway to get equipment from house frontage to barn out back. The FEL will be used for typical material moving, landscape improving, winter snowbanks (have ATV w/blade & snowblower for regular drive clearing). FEL and/or 3PH will be needed to move large rocks.
I have plans for adding either a 3rd function or rear remote. My next implement will most likely be a grapple (lots of woodlot work with this).
I have a GT for mowing, so this CUT will never see lawn mowing duty.
Where I am hung-up is due to the difference in weight between these two units; the K-2601 weighs 1,600#, the MF-1726E weighs 2,600#, substantially more. I agree no one usually complains about buying 'too-large' of a tractor, but between the soft lawns in the spring & fall, I wonder if the extra 1,000# Massey would not be able to be driven over any lawns for some time. Right now my 700# GT is leaving wet trails when I mow. I realize this spring is atypical with the amount of rain & being clay once the rain stops for a while my soil will harden up like concrete. Also, working the woodlot, I wonder if the larger, longer tractor might feel like a 'bull-in-a-china-shop'.
So given the type of work, the nature of the property & usage, does anything really ring out to you with similar properties/equipment experiences? Is there any down-side to having a tractor that might be a bit big/heavy for the property?
Any insights would be very much appreciated - thanks for taking the time to read this!