HK45
Gold Member
Hey everyone,
Im new to the forum and had a few question about a Montana 3940 vs. the farmtrac 390. I already owned a farmtrac 360 a few years ago and loved it, powerful and could work all-day great machine. Since looking at the two and reading, it seems that they are the same tractor, but farmtrac痴 390 seems to have a better lifting rate and weight痴 more. Why is this if they are the same tractor? I do like the Montana 3840 weights and more pto power, but where I live is kind of hilly and I've been reading a lot that hydro is better for hills. Also how many have owned a farmtarc 390 or Montana 3940 I would like to know the feed back on them since I知 a little worried about going to Hydrostatic. Thanks
Im new to the forum and had a few question about a Montana 3940 vs. the farmtrac 390. I already owned a farmtrac 360 a few years ago and loved it, powerful and could work all-day great machine. Since looking at the two and reading, it seems that they are the same tractor, but farmtrac痴 390 seems to have a better lifting rate and weight痴 more. Why is this if they are the same tractor? I do like the Montana 3840 weights and more pto power, but where I live is kind of hilly and I've been reading a lot that hydro is better for hills. Also how many have owned a farmtarc 390 or Montana 3940 I would like to know the feed back on them since I知 a little worried about going to Hydrostatic. Thanks