Kubota L3010 vs. JD 4300 vs. NH TC33D

   / Kubota L3010 vs. JD 4300 vs. NH TC33D #1  

Anonymous Poster

Epic Contributor
Joined
Sep 27, 2005
Messages
29,678
I am repeating this on the NH and Kubota area

I have been looking at the Kubota L3010, New Holland TC33D and John Deer 4300 all with Hydrostatic transmission (HST) and R4 tires. From the specification sheets it was not easy to tell the real difference between them. A couple of the dealers offered to bring them out to my place for me to try. I talked the third one into it and arranged to have them out all at the same time. This is easer said than done but I did get them to overlap by a couple of hours. I lined them all up and took a few digital pictures. I will post them if people would like to see them and the web master will permit the files. This is already a long post but I hope it will be useful.

I have 14 acres total; 8 acres that was old farm land (now weeds) that I will be turning into pasture and 2 acres that will be cleared of brush and made into lawn/pasture. I have planted about 100 trees and a hedge around the property that I will need to maintain. The ability to get under and around the trees has led me to pick these mid size compacts. If I was just working the pasture I would probably look harder at the top size in this series.

I have seen many times on this forum that the dealer can make all of the difference. All of my dealers in Tucson have been extraordinarily helpful. This has taken the dealer factor out of the equation. I also do not come into my evaluation with any brand preference.

I had each dealer bring out a different 5' wide 3pt implement; box scraper, disk and a rotary tiller. I picked these because I was after implements that would take the most power. Aside from front loader work, pulling a box scraper digging in heavy and loading up with dirt was the biggest strain on each. I ran the same box scraper and disk on each tractor. I also used the implements in the same area and soil conditions.

All of the tractors performed the tasks admirably. All power claims seemed to be true. They all stalled or bogged down about the same. I was expecting them to over heat but with temperatures of 105, 106 and 108 Deg F (no, "it is a dry heat" is bull, that is hot!) over my three test days there was no sign of trouble from heat.

Kubota L3010 with LA481 Loader: New unit 3 hours on meter.
Negatives; I asked the sales man to demonstrate the removal of the loader. Four pins must be removed and a support bar on each side dropped down. Problem was it would not come off. A bolt holding the frame on the loader interfered with the tractor frame. The loader is apparently assembled at each dealer. They send a bag of bolts (with lots left over at the end) and the service people take it from there. I went back to the dealer a couple days later after they replaced the bolt that was interfering. It unfortunately took a half hour to have two salesmen demonstrate the "easy" removal of the FEL. They say it should be quick after a little practice. One of the hydraulic connectors is hard to grip since it is very close the frame. Can anybody comment on taking the Kubota FEL on and off on a regular bases? Other than the engine running, none of the electrical worked. Turns out it had been on display at the fair and all of the fuses were removed. Very disappointing since I could not check the work lights. No sign of over heating but I could not watch the temperature gauge. I must give the dealer a break on the electrical because he did not have time to check out the tractor before he brought it out. He only had about two hours notice before I arranged for a demo and he dropped the unit off. The engine compartment side panels are metal but to replace them was difficult, they had to be placed in just the right position to get them to latch, especially the front panel, which also has an electrical connector to fuss with when removing it. My biggest problem was the accelerator pedal. I could not find a comfortable position for reverse. The body work gets in the way when I attempt to use my heel. The cruise control lever is clumsy, but the pedal is smooth so I may not need to use it as much.
Positives; Although the specs do not confirm it, the speed in range 2 seemed much faster than the competitors and it still had plenty of power to drive in and pull out a full bucket.
It is quiet and relatively vibration free. The forward throttle is very smooth and comfortable. This unit looks more like a tractor than the competitors. This comes from larger diameter front and rear tires and a longer front hood. Very quick FEL movement and dual motion.

John Deere 4300 with 420 loader: New unit with 3 hours.
Negatives; I again asked the salesman to remove and replace the loader. During the process he had to lift the front wheel of the tractor with the bucket. This revealed a large hydraulic leak on a rigid line on the bucket frame. He broke out his tool kit and fixed it on the spot but it is very bothersome that a fitting from the factory was not tight. The cruise control worked fine driving on smooth dirt but when disking it would eventually allow the tractor to stop. When asked about this later he said they just changed the pedal configuration at the factory and the magnet on the cruise control would not hold in bumpy conditions. Not encouraging that the factory did not test the modification in field conditions. They are changing the pedals to reduce the force needed to operate them, the problem is I still had a sore knee after operating this tractor 2 hours and that was with the new pedals. The vibration and noise on this tractor is the worst of the three. I ran the New Holland and JD next to each other, moved from seat to seat and all I could hear is the rattling of the JD, even from the NH seat. Only single movement on FEL. Very long flexible rear PTO control, very hard to make fine adjustments. Near the rear PTO up/down lever is the PTO engage lever that is easy to grab by mistake. Hydraulic lines for steering are protected from the front but exposed from the rear, if backing up over brush they could get snagged. Has anybody torn their hydraulic steering lines?
Positives; The FEL goes on and off very easy. It truly does remove from a latch that can be reached from the drivers seat. Very good V shaped guides when pulling up to it to reattach. Starts with turn of key (No PTO engaged) no need to pull out of gear or push in clutch. With PTO engaged the tractor stops if you get out of the seat.

New Holland TC33D No FEL (the loader the dealer was going to attach for the demo did not arrive, expect to put on a Great Bend 240); Used tractor with 153 hours.
Negatives; The specs say it is the same speed in reverse as forward but it only crawled in reverse. The dealer said this could be adjusted. Has anybody changed the maximum reverse speed or is this not really possible? The PTO speed indicator is a light on the dash; in direct sunlight with a little dust on the display the lights are very hard to read. Head light illumination is non-uniform, but good peripheral coverage. Without the FEL it looks like an overgrown lawn mower. Fenders do not cover much of the tires. I assume if I spin the tires in mud I will sling mud everywhere. Must put shift lever in neural before starting. The dealer finally got there loaders in and I looked at one mounted. I did get to remove it part way without any problems but could not really put it through its passes. It was on a new tractor ready for a customer to pick up and I did not want to scratch it up. The movement up and down was slow compared to the Kubota.
Positives; Very quiet smooth ride, down right peaceful after running the JD. Very nice air piston seat, soft up and down and it felt firm side to side. The 20 degree rotation of the seat did help remove some of the strain on my neck when watching the rear implements. Ridged rear PTO lever in comfortable position for my hand and it had good markings plus a height stop. Very good access by lifting hood. Easy to pull radiator screen, filter and battery. Pulled a bigger load in drag box before stalling. Easiest of the three for implement changes. It had the deluxe PTO link but what made it easy was the full float position that let the links move up and down by hand.

The JD is out of the competition but after all of this evaluation I am still having trouble deciding between the Kubota and the NH. Any contradictions or comments on my observations would be appreciated.
 
   / Kubota L3010 vs. JD 4300 vs. NH TC33D #2  
I can comment on the L3010. I bought one last December. The loader removal is really simple. By the third time I took it off I had the time down to 3-4 minutes. I take the loader off in my garage so the floor is solid and level which makes it much easier. I usually put the loader on the ground and then put it in float for a second. This takes all the pressure off the pins and they slide right out with no effort at all. Then just curl the bucket and disconnect the hydraulic lines. I wish the mower came off this easy.

The HST pedal seems fine to me (size 12 shoes). When I first got the tractor I also kept banging my foot into the body but after a couple of hours I realized I didn't need to move my foot that far back onto the pedal and I haven't even noticed it since.

Good Luck! You will love which ever machine you buy. I also had narrowed it down to the Kubota or the NH and I decided on the Kubota because the HST seemed smoother and the engine seemed smoother and quieter than the NH. Also, it was cold when I started them and the Kubota started up easier on the dealers lot.
 
   / Kubota L3010 vs. JD 4300 vs. NH TC33D #3  
Schooner -- Man, I envy you the chance to compare them all on your own property! Here in New England they were all moving so fast the dealers were unwilling to transport unless I bought their tractor!

I also looked at these three tractors before settling on the L3010. The New Holland dealer, at the time, looked about ready to go out of business so I never seriously considered the TC33D. Besides, I liked the other two better anyway.

Between the JD and the Kubota, I actually liked the JD 4300 just a tad more. The hydraulic pump output was particularly impressive. But the same vibration you noticed bothered me, as did several posts on TBN regarding leaking 4300s, loose fasteners, and a number of other quality control issues.

I eventually found and bought a gently used L3010 that was $3,500 less than the 4300. I'm totally impressed! My FEL must be correctly set up, because it takes about 3 minutes to mount or dismount the unit. I hear you about the engine covers. At first I found them rather awkward, but after noticing the proper position I found that lining up a couple of landmarks makes them snap into position with a solid thunk. As for the pedal, going forward is no problem. If I'm going in reverse for short distances I just lift the forward end of the pedal with my toe to go backwards. Only when turning around in the seat and backing long distances while looking over my shoulder go I use the heel pedal...and with my body slightly turned to the right like that the heel pedal is in just the right position.

Can't comment on the heat since it rarely gets over 90 here, but the temp gauge has never gone over 1/4 no matter how hard I work the tractor. Probably won't help you, but it starts just fine at 35 below zero. I have a block heater but have never bothered to plug it in. No need so far.

All three of the tractors you tested are reliable. If the dealers are all decent, it comes down to what you feel most comfortable with. Even if you decide based on which has a cup holder and which doesn't, you won't go wrong.

Pete in Northern Vermont

www.GatewayToVermont.com
 
   / Kubota L3010 vs. JD 4300 vs. NH TC33D
  • Thread Starter
#4  
Thanks Kevin and Boondox. I will assume that the dealer was just not in practice at removing the loader and put that issue aside. Kevin, I have also been looking at the 72" mid mount mower. It sounds like it is not an item that I could plan on removing and attaching on a regular bases? Plus it seams very expensive and I may just hit the tight spots with a cheap Sears type mower. The NH dealer is waiting on loaders to come in but he is going to give me a chance to test the FEL at my place. Guess I can wait another week?
If the Kubota FEL removes easy, from what I have seen the operation of the FEL sure seems superior.
 
   / Kubota L3010 vs. JD 4300 vs. NH TC33D #5  
I remove my 72" mower on a regular basis and it is not as easy as the loader. The problem is the pins are a little more difficult to reach. It takes me less than 10 minutes to take it off or to put it on. I think if I spend a little time changing the pins to quick release and changing the shackles to a quick release type I can probably get the time down to 5-6 minutes but I will still need to reach under the tractor which means getting down on my knees.....with the loader I can just walk around and pull out the pins.

I was originally thinking about getting a 3pt mower but I decided that the mid mower is much easier to operate which will be important in a couple years when my kids can start doing the mowing for me. Also, the mower cuts the grass before the rear wheels run over the grass. BTW the mower does a fantastic job mowing the lawn...even my wife is happy.
 
   / Kubota L3010 vs. JD 4300 vs. NH TC33D
  • Thread Starter
#6  
Schooner,

Just this past May I looked at the same set of machines. I did not like the JD4300 with hydro, so my comparison was TC33D, L3010HST and JD4300 with Sync Reverse.

I owned at that time a Kubota L245DT (22 HP PTO / 18 Drawbar / 25 Gross), so I had a point of reference. The new machine would be required to out perform the old.

The Kubota dealer delivered a new L3010HST to me with about 10 hours on the clock. I could not pull the ground engaging implements (plow and drags) that I could pull with my old machine. Needless to say, the demo time consisted of hitching and unhitching implements for a grand total of less than one-half hour on the clock! I found in various forums information that Kubota L3010HST can in some cases have very poor performance with ground engaging implements. The dealer came to my place the next day to verify my observations and also concluded that the machine which was sent up could not perform properly. His comment to me was "a bad demo is worse than no demo".

The TC33D pulled all of my implements with ease. In my opinion, it was the most quiet of the three. I took delivery on Memorial day weekend.
 
   / Kubota L3010 vs. JD 4300 vs. NH TC33D #7  
Wow, that surprises me! My L3010 has no trouble dragging a trio of large maple logs uphill. Even pulled the UPS van out of a ditch to freedom once. If the L3010 has trouble pulling ground engaging implements, those other tractors must be hell on wheels! /w3tcompact/icons/wink.gif

Pete

www.GatewayToVermont.com
 
   / Kubota L3010 vs. JD 4300 vs. NH TC33D
  • Thread Starter
#8  
Pete,

Talk about being surprised...I was SHOCKED that my 21 year old, high hour 245 could run circles around the L3010. The dealer thought that a pressure relief valve was not closing properly. However, it was Kubota that convinced me not to buy. The dealer told me that when they contacted Kubota about this problem, Kubota responded that there was nothing wrong with the tractor and repairs were not authorized. Also, it took nearly two weeks to get response from Kubota.

In another forum pertaining to L3010s, somebody who identified themselves as a Kubota mechanic stated that up to 60 percent of the gross HP is lost in the transmission. If that is really the case, then the 32 gross HP L3010HST only has 12.8HP available to apply to moving the tractor and the implement. This calculated available HP is consistant with the performance of the demo machine.

The demo machine ran a mower without bogging down in areas that would drag down the 245, so I don't believe that engine performance was a problem. However, with only one 3010 in stock, Kubota stone-walling the dealer on repairs and given a BIG difference in performance, it didn't take long to decide to switch colors.

Regarding the TC33D being "hell on wheels"...I think it is. In the past month, my boy and I have put nearly 60 hours on the machine. It has pulled the plow and drags without any problem as we finished the tilling and planting season. I haven't been able to bog down the motor with either my five foot finish mower or rotary cutter. If it weren't for a lightning storm and heavy rain, I would still be on it and not responding here until dark.

One other item...scheduled maintenance costs. Having recently finished the first 50 hour service I found that the TC33D cost significantly less than the L3010HST for scheduled tranny maintenance. The local NH dealer charges about one-third as much for a five gallon bucket of hydro oil when compared to the Kubota dealer's price for Super UDT. Filter costs appear to be equivalent. The net difference is about $100 per fluid change.

MarkK
 
   / Kubota L3010 vs. JD 4300 vs. NH TC33D #9  
Mark,

I am glad you are satisfied with your new tractor. But, I am somewhat dismayed by your experience with the L3010. (to say the least!) I just got off my L3410 HST where I was sitting since 10 am (it's almost 4pm now) I was pulling a Gannon box blade that is a tad over 800 pounds. It needs to have the front bucket filled with dirt for traction, then it can pull the box full to overflowing. When it bogs down in the mid range of the tranny, I can put it in low and start back up. The times it does fail to pull, are when I have the rear diff locked (in 4wd) and have 3 or 4 tires spinning. (I blame the R4's, not the power available.)

I find it hard to imagine that you are pulling much better than I am. If you are, then I am REALLY impressed! It is a good thing that you got to demo your equipment and found which tractor works best for you. That's what it is all about.

John Bud


35-43507-little_tractor.gif
 
   / Kubota L3010 vs. JD 4300 vs. NH TC33D
  • Thread Starter
#10  
Having all three tractors out at the same time I would say they were all very similar in power. I would only give a slight power edge to the TC33D. The L3010 did pull through most of the time with a full 5' box scraper. It took pretty good traction to stall in 2nd range and the tires typically spun in low range. I think Markk demoed a malfunctioning tractor.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2016 Hino 258 Roll Back (A52384)
2016 Hino 258 Roll...
John Deere 5203 Tractor (RIDE AND DRIVE) (A50774)
John Deere 5203...
IH 445 Square Baler (A50515)
IH 445 Square...
TEST YOUR BID BUTTON! (A51242)
TEST YOUR BID...
UNUSED JCT SKID STEER QUICK ATTACH 72" TILLER (A51244)
UNUSED JCT SKID...
Aluma 7712H Tilt Trailer (A50514)
Aluma 7712H Tilt...
 
Top