rbargeron
Elite Member
Back in March I disassembled 2001 L48 for HST repairs. Reverse had been weak since I got the tractor several years before. We found the swash plate cradle bearings had worn down until one went out of position without warning, blocking reverse. There's a thread about the split/reassemble posted here. That thread rambles on a bit, so this one summarizes specific HST findings that might be useful to people considering a used L48.
The L48's HST is the same unit used in Lxx10 tractors, which weigh half as much. I've been a cheerleader on TBN and OTT for Kubota's HST - but this discovery has shaken my faith in the adequacy of this unit for the L48's weight. I think operator technique can have an effect too. This is relevant in a prospective purchase situation because Without major disassembly of the tractor the condition of the cradle bearings is completely unknowable, even if nearly worn out, .
Other than the worn cradle bearings the oil inside was clean, with no identifiable wear on any other parts. The HST operated silently except reverse was weak. With new cradle bearings its all working fine now. I bought it in 2013 knowing it might need several hundred in parts and a lot of wrenching, so its an ok outcome. Hope this is useful. Dick B.
The L48's HST is the same unit used in Lxx10 tractors, which weigh half as much. I've been a cheerleader on TBN and OTT for Kubota's HST - but this discovery has shaken my faith in the adequacy of this unit for the L48's weight. I think operator technique can have an effect too. This is relevant in a prospective purchase situation because Without major disassembly of the tractor the condition of the cradle bearings is completely unknowable, even if nearly worn out, .
Other than the worn cradle bearings the oil inside was clean, with no identifiable wear on any other parts. The HST operated silently except reverse was weak. With new cradle bearings its all working fine now. I bought it in 2013 knowing it might need several hundred in parts and a lot of wrenching, so its an ok outcome. Hope this is useful. Dick B.
Last edited: