We purchased 15 acres of land in western Kentucky back in September 2002. The land is bounded on three sides by thick woods. The western edge has mostly grasses and a few trees. There is also a row of trees that horizontally splits the property into two halves. Before we bought the land, it was used for crops--I think they grew hay.
We will be moving there to retire in 2006 and build a house on that land. We have had the land bush hogged once at a cost of $400. That's a lot of money for us! /forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif Our question is, do we need to regularly (once or twice a year) bush hog the property or would it be more economical to just let it grow up and cut it once when we're ready to build? My concern is that the land will grow up so thick and have so many new trees growing on it that it will be more expensive to cut it once in 2006 than to spend $300-$400 three or four times in the interim.
Thoughts? /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif Thanks!
We will be moving there to retire in 2006 and build a house on that land. We have had the land bush hogged once at a cost of $400. That's a lot of money for us! /forums/images/graemlins/tongue.gif Our question is, do we need to regularly (once or twice a year) bush hog the property or would it be more economical to just let it grow up and cut it once when we're ready to build? My concern is that the land will grow up so thick and have so many new trees growing on it that it will be more expensive to cut it once in 2006 than to spend $300-$400 three or four times in the interim.
Thoughts? /forums/images/graemlins/confused.gif Thanks!