The sad part about this is a couple of months from now a high degree of probability exist that a large civil lawsuit will be filed against Law Enforcement for dereliction of duty. Allegation will be they, Law Enforcement and other Civil Authorities knew the protest ride was planned and probably had the riders under visual observation and took no enforcement action to prevent them from engaging in illegal activity. The allegation will allege if civil authorities and Law Enforcement had enforced the law, no injury or death would have occurred.
They have been trying to get the 'helmet optional' thing here in Michigan. Our state is a no fault insurance state, and we all pay in to a fund for catastrophic auto accidents to help pay for long term medical. My take is [ long time bike rider ] that if they want to go helmetless, they should have to carry extra medical insurance to cover their own arse. Which they, of course, do not want to pay..... They want all of us to cover them for when they need their diaper changed/druil wiped off their face... and not man up and pay for extra insurance ahead of time.
I just have to wonder how this is different from other individuals who are injured doing other risky/dangerous activities?
Many see the very act of riding a motorcycle as unnecessarily dangerous and refer to them as "murdercycles" as per Joan Claybrooke.