TORQUIN
Silver Member
First of all, I don't own a Kubota yet. I am trying to decide between trannies right now. I am planning on an L3830 with 4 in 1 FEL and BH. I currently own a 1964 Ford 4000 diesel that has 52 or 55 hp, no FEL, BH or PS.
At the dealer, I test drove a 4330 with HST and no FEL, and a 3830 with FST. The dealer does not have a GST in stock right now, but will call me when he does so I can test drive it.
The HST on the 4330, even with 43 hp, seemed weak in high range. It felt weaker than the FST on the 3830, even though the 3830 has less HP.
My aunt just purchased a 3130 with FEL, which I also test drove. My test consisted of what could the tractor do all out in high range. The HST seems to be robbing RPM from the engine like crazy, where the FST does not. I pushed the pedal all the way down (and nearly stalled it) and got up to whatever speed, increased the throttle to full, but it seemed like it was underpowered. When I let off the Go pedal, the RPM jumped WAY up.
Maybe this is just me, and being used to the higher HP of my Ford 4000. I know that I'm not going to be racing the tractor, but when I want to get from point A to point B, such as getting to the actual "job site", I expect the tractor to be able to get up and go. The HST doesn't seem to have the go needed.
I'd like to hear other's impressions of this.
I'm not looking for a tranny war, just opinions so I can figure out if I am overestimating what I expect from these tractors, or too "HP spoiled" by my truck.
Thanks,
Chris
--------------
99 Dodge Ram 2500, QC, Cummins with twin turbos. Best ET 14.50.
At the dealer, I test drove a 4330 with HST and no FEL, and a 3830 with FST. The dealer does not have a GST in stock right now, but will call me when he does so I can test drive it.
The HST on the 4330, even with 43 hp, seemed weak in high range. It felt weaker than the FST on the 3830, even though the 3830 has less HP.
My aunt just purchased a 3130 with FEL, which I also test drove. My test consisted of what could the tractor do all out in high range. The HST seems to be robbing RPM from the engine like crazy, where the FST does not. I pushed the pedal all the way down (and nearly stalled it) and got up to whatever speed, increased the throttle to full, but it seemed like it was underpowered. When I let off the Go pedal, the RPM jumped WAY up.
Maybe this is just me, and being used to the higher HP of my Ford 4000. I know that I'm not going to be racing the tractor, but when I want to get from point A to point B, such as getting to the actual "job site", I expect the tractor to be able to get up and go. The HST doesn't seem to have the go needed.
I'd like to hear other's impressions of this.
I'm not looking for a tranny war, just opinions so I can figure out if I am overestimating what I expect from these tractors, or too "HP spoiled" by my truck.
Thanks,
Chris
--------------
99 Dodge Ram 2500, QC, Cummins with twin turbos. Best ET 14.50.