Dougster
Veteran Member
As I sit here unable to work on a rainy day after just having had to reject a new job for lack of appropriate equipment, I am left pondering in what direction my struggling little one-person "compact tractor & backhoe services" business should take. I've mentioned before that my Mahindra 4110 with ML112 FEL and Bradco 509 BH is a wonderful little "jack of all trades"... but it is also too often the master of none (or at least too few). It is amazing how many jobs the Mahindra is too small for... and, conversely, too big for. Along those lines, I've thought hard about adding one of the following three items of equipment to expand the range of work I can accept at the high and/or low end of the job size spectrum:
a) A track-type or wheeled skidsteer, or
b) A mini-track excavator, or
c) A more powerful compact TLB (think: JD110, L39/L48, Yanmar CBL40 or equal)
I am limited to no more than one possible addition right now by both economic and practical/legal/tax realities... and the one addition MUST pay for itself in expanded business or I end up in very deep trouble very fast.
As if that question isn't already hard enough, the paradox of the one-person business also comes into play. With absolutely no ability (or any real burning desire) to hire on experienced, qualified, licensed employees, I must do everything myself. I must maintain, store, move and operate each piece of equipment that I own all by myself. Even if I owned 10 pieces of rolling stock, I can only deal with one item at a time and the logistics of moving and using such multiple pieces of equipment eventually becomes self-defeating in increased wasted time... mainly related to equipment movement.
So what is the answer? Am I already at the maximum/optimum size and practical job size limit for a one person business? One person, one machine? Should I just sit here and try to be happy??? Or is there a way to increase my effective job size range with another item of equipment from the list above without significantly increasing non-productive time... or at least increasing it no more than the time savings I'd realize by owning a wider range of equipment? And if so, what item of equipment might that be??? And please don't suggest rental equipment. I end up working for nothing (or worse). Same with subcontracting. It's a big net loser at my level.
Does adding another piece of equipment makes sense? Or is the "one person, one machine" situation I'm currently in "as good as it gets"?
Dougster
a) A track-type or wheeled skidsteer, or
b) A mini-track excavator, or
c) A more powerful compact TLB (think: JD110, L39/L48, Yanmar CBL40 or equal)
I am limited to no more than one possible addition right now by both economic and practical/legal/tax realities... and the one addition MUST pay for itself in expanded business or I end up in very deep trouble very fast.
As if that question isn't already hard enough, the paradox of the one-person business also comes into play. With absolutely no ability (or any real burning desire) to hire on experienced, qualified, licensed employees, I must do everything myself. I must maintain, store, move and operate each piece of equipment that I own all by myself. Even if I owned 10 pieces of rolling stock, I can only deal with one item at a time and the logistics of moving and using such multiple pieces of equipment eventually becomes self-defeating in increased wasted time... mainly related to equipment movement.
So what is the answer? Am I already at the maximum/optimum size and practical job size limit for a one person business? One person, one machine? Should I just sit here and try to be happy??? Or is there a way to increase my effective job size range with another item of equipment from the list above without significantly increasing non-productive time... or at least increasing it no more than the time savings I'd realize by owning a wider range of equipment? And if so, what item of equipment might that be??? And please don't suggest rental equipment. I end up working for nothing (or worse). Same with subcontracting. It's a big net loser at my level.
Does adding another piece of equipment makes sense? Or is the "one person, one machine" situation I'm currently in "as good as it gets"?
Dougster
Last edited: