Snow Equipment Owning/Operating Bring on the snow

   / Bring on the snow #1  

ragkar

Platinum Member
Joined
May 11, 2007
Messages
818
Location
eastern PA-lower Poconos
Tractor
JD2320 w/R4 $21,100 w/7.16%off
For the first time in forty years I'm looking forwards to heavy snow. For the first thirty-five years I was snow shoveling until I got a walk-behind snow thrower.
But it sure is a pain with the wind whipping the snow back in my face. I have a 600 foot by eleven foot driveway and I'd have to walk it up and down three times to clear it with that machine. And the wind blows and it's cold and the snow flies.
Last summer I got my JD cut with a snow blade (54") and I love it. I look forwards to plowing the driveway clear. It hasn't snowed much this winter but it isn't over yet.
There have been slight problems though. The rubber cutting edge doesn't work at all over ice and frozen snow. My neighbor uses a steel edge and that works well on ice but I think he is damaging the asphalt. Maybe he and I could get together to buy urethane edges (ten feet for $300) and then cut it.
Any starting problems were eliminated by my battery warmer and a trash bag over the seat eliminates the need to brush that off.
The real test will be a heavy fall of twelve to twenty-four inches. But if the plow won't work, I still have the snow thrower.
Finally after all these years I've solved the snow shoveling problem.
 
   / Bring on the snow #2  
My story exactly, but I opted to get a PTO mounted snowblower. It loves and eats 8-10 inches of snow, throws it up out of the way. I have the FEL if needed to stack or for really light snowfalls.
 
   / Bring on the snow #3  
You may be getting your wish in the near future.:D

*************************************************************************************

The Sun Also Sets
By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Thursday, February 07, 2008 4:20 PM PT

Climate Change: Not every scientist is part of Al Gore's mythical "consensus." Scientists worried about a new ice age seek funding to better observe something bigger than your SUV the sun.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Related Topics: Global Warming


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Back in 1991, before Al Gore first shouted that the Earth was in the balance, the Danish Meteorological Institute released a study using data that went back centuries that showed that global temperatures closely tracked solar cycles.

To many, those data were convincing. Now, Canadian scientists are seeking additional funding for more and better "eyes" with which to observe our sun, which has a bigger impact on Earth's climate than all the tailpipes and smokestacks on our planet combined.

And they're worried about global cooling, not warming.

Kenneth Tapping, a solar researcher and project director for Canada's National Research Council, is among those looking at the sun for evidence of an increase in sunspot activity.

Solar activity fluctuates in an 11-year cycle. But so far in this cycle, the sun has been disturbingly quiet. The lack of increased activity could signal the beginning of what is known as a Maunder Minimum, an event which occurs every couple of centuries and can last as long as a century.

Such an event occurred in the 17th century. The observation of sunspots showed extraordinarily low levels of magnetism on the sun, with little or no 11-year cycle.

This solar hibernation corresponded with a period of bitter cold that began around 1650 and lasted, with intermittent spikes of warming, until 1715. Frigid winters and cold summers during that period led to massive crop failures, famine and death in Northern Europe.

Tapping reports no change in the sun's magnetic field so far this cycle and warns that if the sun remains quiet for another year or two, it may indicate a repeat of that period of drastic cooling of the Earth, bringing massive snowfall and severe weather to the Northern Hemisphere.

Tapping oversees the operation of a 60-year-old radio telescope that he calls a "stethoscope for the sun." But he and his colleagues need better equipment.

In Canada, where radio-telescopic monitoring of the sun has been conducted since the end of World War II, a new instrument, the next-generation solar flux monitor, could measure the sun's emissions more rapidly and accurately.

As we have noted many times, perhaps the biggest impact on the Earth's climate over time has been the sun.

For instance, researchers at the Max Planck Institute for Solar Research in Germany report the sun has been burning more brightly over the last 60 years, accounting for the 1 degree Celsius increase in Earth's temperature over the last 100 years.

R. Timothy Patterson, professor of geology and director of the Ottawa-Carleton Geoscience Center of Canada's Carleton University, says that "CO2 variations show little correlation with our planet's climate on long, medium and even short time scales."

Rather, he says, "I and the first-class scientists I work with are consistently finding excellent correlations between the regular fluctuations of the sun and earthly climate. This is not surprising. The sun and the stars are the ultimate source of energy on this planet."

Patterson, sharing Tapping's concern, says: "Solar scientists predict that, by 2020, the sun will be starting into its weakest Schwabe cycle of the past two centuries, likely leading to unusually cool conditions on Earth."

"Solar activity has overpowered any effect that CO2 has had before, and it most likely will again," Patterson says. "If we were to have even a medium-sized solar minimum, we could be looking at a lot more bad effects than 'global warming' would have had."

In 2005, Russian astronomer Khabibullo Abdusamatov made some waves and not a few enemies in the global warming "community" by predicting that the sun would reach a peak of activity about three years from now, to be accompanied by "dramatic changes" in temperatures.

A Hoover Institution Study a few years back examined historical data and came to a similar conclusion.

"The effects of solar activity and volcanoes are impossible to miss. Temperatures fluctuated exactly as expected, and the pattern was so clear that, statistically, the odds of the correlation existing by chance were one in 100," according to Hoover fellow Bruce Berkowitz.

The study says that "try as we might, we simply could not find any relationship between industrial activity, energy consumption and changes in global temperatures."

The study concludes that if you shut down all the world's power plants and factories, "there would not be much effect on temperatures."

But if the sun shuts down, we've got a problem. It is the sun, not the Earth, that's hanging in the balance.
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2008 John Deere 608C combine head (A50657)
2008 John Deere...
Case International B600 Silage Blower (A50774)
Case International...
6" Centrifugal Pump on Frame (A50121)
6" Centrifugal...
2010 Lincoln MKS Sedan (A50324)
2010 Lincoln MKS...
2018 FREIGHTLINER CASCADIA TANDEM AXLE DAY CAB (A52576)
2018 FREIGHTLINER...
2009 MACK GRANITE (A52472)
2009 MACK GRANITE...
 
Top