k6dyc said:
Hehe, yep, what is "lawful" is a real debate. The CO definition say
approximately 20' apart, so does that mean 30' with stays is OK? Would 35' be too far if it was solid and in good shape? And look at the difference in AZ, they require 4 strands instead of 3, and they require stays if posts are more than 16.5' (a rod) apart, what a mess! And did you notice that the definitions all specify barbed wire? Do you think that Sandi would let me get away with using devil wire anywhere near her horses?????

So, if someones cattle get into my property, I guess I'll just have to be liable for the damages with no recourse to the cattle owner. I could have worse problems....
It doesn't
always have to be barbed wire.

To quote a section of Texas law that applies in
some, but not
all situations:
§ 143.028.
FENCES[0]. (a) A person is not required to
fence[0]
against animals that are not permitted to run at large. Except as
otherwise provided by this section, a
fence[0] is sufficient for
purposes of this chapter if it is sufficient to keep out ordinary
livestock[0] permitted to run at large.
(b) In order to be sufficient, a
fence[0] must be at least four
feet high and comply with the following requirements:
(1) a barbed wire
fence[0] must consist of three wires on
posts no more than 30 feet apart, with one or more stays between
every two posts;
(2) a picket
fence[0] must consist of pickets that are not
more than six inches apart;
(3) a board
fence[0] must consist of three boards not less
than five inches wide and one inch thick; and
(4) a rail
fence[0] must consist of four rails.
(c) The freeholders of the county or area may petition the
commissioners court for an election to determine whether three
barbed wires without a board are to constitute a sufficient
fence[0] in
the county or area. The election shall be conducted in the same
manner and is governed by the same provisions of this subchapter
provided for elections on the adoption of this subchapter.