1526 vs Max 26XL

   / 1526 vs Max 26XL #1  

matemike

Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2016
Messages
29
Location
Brazoria, Texas
Tractor
New Holland T1510
Hello all, new here, 2nd post.

I've been researching for about a month and have pretty much decided on Mahindra. I will still probably spend another month contemplating before I make my first ever own tractor purchase. I've seen many threads comparing the eMax to the Max lines and the 1538 to the 2538, but nothing comparing the Max line to the 1500 series. Particularly I'm looking between the largest of the Max line the Max 26XL and the smallest of the 1500 line being the 1526. Interested in nothing but HST. I test drove and looked at financing plans for a Max 26XL. Nice little tractor with a decent price too.

I live on 2.5 acres and have been getting by for three years now with wheel barrows, a 4 wheeler and my truck bed for all of our large gardening work. Seems like we are always having to add mulch to a few thousand square feet of gardens around the house and pool. We've resorted to having dump trucks deliver it in 6 to 10 yard loads at a time. We usually use wheel barrows to spread the mulch or I've also borrowed the neighbors 75 hp tractor which is extremely useful but cumbersome around the house. Our place also has 10 palm trees that need trimming two times a year and palm leaves aren't small. Needless to say that a burn pile is almost always present. As soon as we burn one down, I gather it all back up by hand and start building it up again. A little tractor will suit my needs exponentially well. I'd store it and even use it in my 30x40 shop for lifting things up to my loft or the occasional thing into my truck bed, etc.
But just how compact or sub compact will suit me best?

It seems to me on paper that the Max 26XL can do everything the 1526 can but it can do it in tighter spaces. The specs show they both have the same engine, a Mitsubishi 3 cylinder, indirect injection, 25.6 hp diesel. The 1526 can lift a mere 158 more lbs to full height with the FEL and it has only 105 more lbs of break out force (curling) capability. It can also raise these loads only 2" higher than the max 26. So my main question is why on earth would anyone choose a Mahindra 1526 over the Max 26XL? The max is smaller and will get more places bringing the same amount of power with it along with less chance of getting stuck being lighter. In addition for being lighter it will fit on a trailer and tow easier as well. I think all the 1526 has going for it are the larger tires, higher ground clearance, a little more FEL volume and lifting capacity, and more of a "real" tractor look.

My main concern is that the Max line is sort of considered a sub-compact tractor, also referred to as a riding mower on steroids. I do not want to sell myself short and find that the first time I go to push up my half burnt brush pile back together that the max couldn't do it. But if it couldn't do it then the 1526 would have probably fallen short as well being they have the same engine power plant. So this then leads me into feeling like if I'm going to get a tractor then I should be getting a real tractor and step up to the 1533. This is a decent upgrade being a direct injected 4 cyl engine with 34.5 hp. The 1533 loader can lift loads over a foot higher then the 26 hp tractors and it is all on the same frame as the 1526. A little more cumbersome than the Max series, but I think I could still get around the house, fences, gates and gardens with the 1500 series being that I made a JD 75 hp tractor on ags work back there.

FWIW I do not plan to mow with any newly purchased tractor. Currently I have a yard guy who cuts, edges and cleans for an incredible price. My wife and I have both agreed that if he ever leaves our area that we'll buy our own zero turn. The only attachments I think I'd ever get for this tractor is a box blade and maybe a little tiller, so PTO power is not a huge issue to me. The loader capability and the nimbleness of the tractor are my main concerns. My property is south of Houston Texas and nothing but flat San Augustine grass, except where the burn pile is which is outside of the back fence; still on my property but almost down in a ditch. When it's wet the 4wd will be required. Just wanting to make the sure the Max 26xl is the real deal as lots of reviews says it is.Or, if I'm missing something about the 1526 that makes it exceed the max 26 then please tell me. But tell me too if skipping the 1526 and going to the 1533 is smarter as many forum guys say to always get something bigger than what you think you need for the just in case scenario.

Thanks for all your help.
 
   / 1526 vs Max 26XL #2  
As you stated the Max 26XL would be more along the lines of a sub-compact and the 1533 a compact tractor. It doesn't sound like you have a need for anything bigger than the Max. Being in Texas there's no worry about pushing and moving heavy wet snow. Maybe you should rent a tractor for a day or a weekend and see what your needs really are...size wise. Looks like there's a NES Rentals 20 minutes from you and I'm sure they deliver the rental.

Backhoe, 8-1 Dig, Diesel, 4WD - NES Rentals
 
   / 1526 vs Max 26XL #3  
With a small property like yours the Max 26XL is more than enough tractor for your chores. It doesn't even come close to being a riding lawn mower on steroids. And by the way, if it make you feel better, Mahindra refers to the Max as a mid-compact, not a sub-compact.
 
   / 1526 vs Max 26XL #5  
the 1526 is a whole lot more tractor than the max. Wider, taller, heavier, more stable foot print. The three speed gears in the hst is worth the price difference alone.

they are really different machines.Just sit on one and you'll immediately know the difference.

I agree with the poster above, that the max is all you need..
 
   / 1526 vs Max 26XL
  • Thread Starter
#6  
With a small property like yours the Max 26XL is more than enough tractor for your chores. It doesn't even come close to being a riding lawn mower on steroids.

Thank you, that is the exact kind of answer I was looking to see; and I figured so about everything or more than I need.

Might be worth taking a peek at a thread comparing a Kubota B series to the Max 26XL, CUT vs SCUT....

Been all through that thread. Thanks. Considering the Kub 2650 because it seems to be right in between the max 26 and 1526 sizes. Wish I knew if the B2650 were a direct injection engine.


the 1526 is a whole lot more tractor than the max. Wider, taller, heavier, more stable foot print. The three speed gears in the hst is worth the price difference alone.

they are really different machines.Just sit on one and you'll immediately know the difference.

I agree with the poster above, that the max is all you need..

I did sit on one and noticed everything you said. Very nice tractor indeed. The 3 speed HST upgrade makes sense. But still, why is a suitable engine in a 1800 lb tractor considered suitable in a 2400 lb tractor? Is the extra HST range a lower gear so the 25.6 hp engine can drive it with less effort? It just seemed like going to the 1500 series meant the 34.5 hp engine was a no-brainer besides the hit on the bank account.
 
   / 1526 vs Max 26XL #7  
It's not a direct injection engine...
Screen Shot 10-06-16 at 01.48 PM.JPG
 
   / 1526 vs Max 26XL #8  
the low gear, more weight turns it into a bulldozer, before spinning the tires. Better pulling heavy loads and better braking going down hills. M range is for general overall use and H is for level ground, road use though I've used H plowing snow and carting bucket loads of material from the source pile to the place of use. The range of gears is very handy.

the heavier overall weight along with bigger wheels and tires gives you better traction along with better stability. I think you'll find better overall capability even though the engines are rated the same hp, on paper anyways.

Just answering your question. I still think the max would be best for your situation.
 
   / 1526 vs Max 26XL #9  
See My threads on what I did with my Max28. The Loader on a 1526 is way more useful than a Max 26 as the Max26 comparatively has low curl strength, even if it can lift 90% of what a 1526 can at the pins. I suspect where the breakout force is measured is different on the 1526 to the Max, so take the numbers with a grain of salt. Putting 1526 curl cylinders on my max made a HUGE difference.

To use the lift capacity of a Max26, for safety, I'd hang a back hoe or 3 Pt counter weight and load the tires. Max28/26 have an very strong 3 Pt Hitch, but the frame is a lot less stiff than the 1526.

I wanted a strong small tractor, I got it with the Max, but for general one tractor operation, it might be too small. Value wise, you get more metal with a 1526.

That said, small is a backsaver.

Power wise, the Max is quite ample, the 1526 will be fine, if you don't expect to much from the PTO.
 
   / 1526 vs Max 26XL #10  
the Max 26xl will do everything you need... plus on a smaller scale... I run one on my 65 acres... backhoe digs everything I've needed done, 5' brush hog, 51" tiller, single drop plow, 6' York rake...
this sub handles it all... if it wont lift it, it pushes it out of the way, or if I cant pull a boulder, I dig a hole right next to it deep enough to cover...
you wont be unsatisfied if you get the 26... good luck...
 

Tractor & Equipment Auctions

2011 Kia Rio Sedan (A42744)
2011 Kia Rio Sedan...
Baldor TS80 81kVA 3-Phase Towable Diesel Generator (A42742)
Baldor TS80 81kVA...
2012 FREIGHTLINER CORONADO 122 SD (A45333)
2012 FREIGHTLINER...
USA 36" 9.5T Excavator Bucket (A42203)
USA 36" 9.5T...
MBW GROUND POUNDER (A45333)
MBW GROUND POUNDER...
YANMAR VIO17 MINI EXCAVATOR (A45333)
YANMAR VIO17 MINI...
 
Top