I got a call back from a county commissioner and it's his understanding the solar project replaced the wind. He was approached by the wind company about leasing his land early on and he declined. Some of his neighbors did sign on but were later notified that the wind project changed to solar.
I called the energy company a bunch of times and it's just automated and dumps you to voicemail. Of course, they never call you back. However, one of the calls, I selected "Landowner looking to lease" and I immediately got a live person. Funny how that works. I asked the person if the windfarm portion of the project was still active and he went and checked. He came back on and told me he only saw the solar as being active. We've been doing AI searches and it only refers to the solar part of the project, but it's common for different assets of a project to get sold to other entities as they progress, further complicating the research process.
The wind farms have really lost favor in Oklahoma, with a nearby project in McIntosh County being scrapped due to public opposition. However, I need something definitive to put this to rest or it's a deal breaker. We have 7 more days to get our answers.
From my research, the FAA filing listed the proposed turbines to be 650' tall. Probably 500' tower plus the blade length. These aren't something you can just turn your back to and ignore they're there. That's the issue I have with wind power. I'm all for land-owner rights, but this isn't the same as someone painting their house an ugly color or having broke down cars on their front lawn. This is something that people see for 10's- 100's of miles, 24/7/365, day or night.
What's ironic, is I work in the power generation industry commissioning simple-cycle and combined-cycle power plants.