ruffdog
Super Star Member
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2011
- Messages
- 10,705
- Location
- southern wisconsin
- Tractor
- Bobcat Toolcat 5610G, Deere X744, Cub Cadet IH 982
It was a joke..................... 
Because nobody wants radioactive waste transported through their town to offsite storage. (which doesn't exist anyway).More than likely right next to the waste that's already there.
Or think that every plant is another Chernobyl just waiting to happen.Most people have a completely ignorant understanding of nuclear waste in modern reactors. Too much Simpsons, too little science.
Because nobody wants radioactive waste transported through their town to offsite storage. (which doesn't exist anyway).
Remember the railcars scattered around a town after a recent derailment ? And here's the granddaddy of the type - an entire railyard destroyed. Roseville Railyard Disaster. They're still finding shrapnel 50 years later.
Woke me up 15 miles away!
Also an entire trainload of pesticides derailed into the headwaters of the Sacramento River a little later.
There will emerge a lot of NIMBYs if routine transport of radioactive waste is ever considered again.
![]()
Diagram source
Better description and of course Wikipedia.
Then the answer is to keep them under a strict 80MPH speed limit.They need to put out the more modern reactors, the old ones had way too many flaws and complications.
But the new ones cost a lot and no one wants to chance it after so many melt downs.
We were at the Yankee nuclear plant when we were in our teens for a tour.
The guide said the canisters they use to transport waste were good up to 80mph impact.
My brother asked what happens at 90MPH like everyone does on the highway, the guide went silent and then moved on. Did not instill confidence.
It's not that the new ones cost a lot, its that companies take a lot of risk because of overregulation and lack of a real comprehensive energy policy.They need to put out the more modern reactors, the old ones had way too many flaws and complications.
But the new ones cost a lot and no one wants to chance it after so many melt downs.
We were at the Yankee nuclear plant when we were in our teens for a tour.
The guide said the canisters they use to transport waste were good up to 80mph impact.
My brother asked what happens at 90MPH like everyone does on the highway, the guide went silent and then moved on. Did not instill confidence.
There have only been 2 meltdowns. Both in Ukraine.They need to put out the more modern reactors, the old ones had way too many flaws and complications.
But the new ones cost a lot and no one wants to chance it after so many melt downs.
Either A) you misremember what was saidWe were at the Yankee nuclear plant when we were in our teens for a tour.
The guide said the canisters they use to transport waste were good up to 80mph impact.
My brother asked what happens at 90MPH like everyone does on the highway, the guide went silent and then moved on. Did not instill confidence.
If that was real, it would have to be much lower because of the risk of a head-on with someone going much faster.Then the answer is to keep them under a strict 80MPH speed limit.