Great clip, and well worth watching. It sounds a bit like the tractor was pushed to market too quickly by "engineers" that don't actually use tractors.
Yep, bumped into that when I found this thread. A lot is shown by their chart:
Obviously new companies have a lot of capital expenses, but those shouldn't show as a net loss. Nonetheless, it appears as if the more tractors they made, the more they lost. I.E. They needed to price the tractors twice as expensive, which would have taken a bite out of the market. Or, find ways to reduce the cost of batteries.
How much were the tractors new? Hmmm....
The 25 HP Category e25 is a versatile, 4WD tractor, great for hobby farms, golf courses, sports fields, equestrian centers, and municipalities.
solectrac.com
$29,249 basic tractor
$4,579 front loader
$1,499 industrial tires.
So, around $35K.
There are a few on Craigslist at the moment from about $25,000 to $32,699. I'm not seeing the larger ones on Craigslist.
It would be a fun little tractor,
SWEET!!!!
A little more expensive than my 977K, but an awful lot less expensive than a brand new CAT. I haven't had the opportunity to fill the fuel tank on the 977K yet.
The CATS are massively heavy. Perhaps replace some steel and iron with batteries.
It would depend on where those get used. Probably not the best for remote logging operations.
However, it would be good for use at a business that had a fixed yard. And, even for a commercial operation, either plan on bringing it for site prep for one day and finishing, or bringing power into a subdivision early to recharge equipment.
Anyway, if they can keep it under $100K, there will be a market. And, of course, if it comes close to the specs listed.