Snobdds
Super Member
401k offers multiple levels of benefit.
Almost every company I worked for offer a 50% match on the 1st 6%. You'd be awfully silly not to contribute at least 6%.
Next, you get to defer the taxes. For us, that meant avoiding high tax rates during our prime earning years and paying taxes on it now when we have very low income. Currently, that means paying 12% or less versus over 30%. (Different rules for Roth)
In a pinch, you can borrow against your 401k and pay yourself back the 'interest'. (And it is still not income, because it's a loan).
Those 1st two guarantee I would not stop contributing. At most, I would consider reducing contributions to the max match rate (personally, I would invest as much as allowed, as long as I could still pay my living expenses).
There may be a few unique situations for high earners or those with a generous pension where the tax benefit is lessened. Even then, the matching is hard to throw away.
Most wealthy people never have real income. They take loans against an equity position and live off loans to themselves. Most time the dividends replace the money taken out and the principle continues to grow.
We all do it and so do politicians. They won't fix it because it would hurt them and their donors.
It avoids a lot of tax burden.
I beg to differ...
