arrow
Super Member
Good video. I like his work, generally well thoughtout comparison tests.
I use Stihl semi-chisel for mostly clean pine, maple, some oak and related brush clearing, although as Mr. SawyerRob points out, Stihl is $ure proud of them.
Maybe a year ago, I read on a web forum somewhere (so it must be true!) that recently purchased Oregon chains seemed to be needing more frequent sharpenings, vs Oregon chains from the past.
I would gladly use the less expensive Oregon if I didn't need to stop and sharpen after every other tank of gas.
Any views on recent changes in their "stay sharp" performance or quality?
I am unsure if the "stay sharp" aspect really comes into play with a touch up at every tank fill. I am simply in the habit of doing so every time whether the chain needs it or not but most of the time I find it does. The Oregons do fine in this regard. The Stihl chains I've used may go a tank and a half but that never made a difference to me as even they got touched up.
I actually found Stihl chains easier to touch up but a bit harder to get a recovery sharpening on them. Stihl files worked well on them as did the Pherd files.
In the field, it was simply easier to switch out chain rather than to bother with a knicked cutter.
Time was money in the pro logger world but I found myself using the same techniques from that profession when I retired and became a regular "home owner cutter"
I will say I like the European files better than the Oregon files and always have.
You can hand retouch an 18" chain in under 4 minutes when you become adroit at doing so. Its a lot easier putting 2 or 3 strokes on a chain than messing with 5,6 or 7 strokes because you went too long between sharpenings.