Bird
Rest in Peace
Yep, Eddie, you do make some good pictures.
We have had similar experiences with our Canon A1100IS.My Canon SX30is had a 35 power optical zoom, Image Stabilizer, tons of features and can take hours of video. It is the SDHC format, so there is no tape or disk. Just a card the same size as a SDS card, but capable of holding 32 gigs of memory. I have a 16 gig card in mine and don't think I will ever be able to fill it up.
That has been our experience as well. We have an older Canon DSLR with several lenses and it is great for some things (like shooting pictures from the top of the stands at the demo derby), but it is too big and inconvenient to take everywhere. The little camera gets at least 5x the use that the big one gets and will take better pictures in many situations (indoors or low light).The less you have to carry around, the more likely you are to carry it, and the more likely you are to use it
I have been a HUGE supporter of cameras that use AA batteries. I've been around the world, and know how hard it is to find a specialty battery in some places. Everyone has AA batteries!!!!
Nobody is mentioning the quality of the video and how that plays into what you intend to do with it as well as how much computing power you have at your disposal.
Do you want to make DVD's, Blu Ray (highest quality), YouTube? Different camera and computing requirements for each, to say nothing of the movie making programs themselves. The proper camera for Blu Ray should be full HD 1080P. Those don't cost much these days, maybe around $250. The Flip camera does not shoot full HD and it is going out of business since Cisco dropped it.
If YouTube videos are your goal, the camera can be of less resolution and you don't need much of a computer to handle it.
If you plan on watching the videos on your new large 1080p flat screen, cheaper cameras and processing equipment show their limitations.
I wouldn't go into it blind. There is a lot to research from a number of different angles. Most learn what they can and can't do after they spend the money and I'd venture to say that many of them are disappointed when their videos come out rather fuzzy.
This might not be the right forum for this query.
It's the right forum for me, 'cause I'm trying to learn. My old Olympus is only 3x zoom and 1.3 megapixels, but it usually serves my purpose for still photos. So you might say my primary interest is in a camera that will take moving pictures/movies/videos or whatever the right term is.
Now, as for what kind of videos . . . well, I don't know. I have a VCR tape that I made some years back at my wife's parents' home in West Virginia. I walked around outside and inside "narrating" as I went; sort of an inventory/memory thing. Her parents died some years ago and that house was sold, but we wouldn't want to get rid of that cassette even though I consider myself to be a lousy photographer. I'd like to do something similar with a video inventory of our property. Who knows? I might someday want to send something to Americas Funniest Home Videos:laughing: although I'd consider that to be a remote likelihood at best.
In other words, I know I want moving video capability, with sound, but beyond that . . . well, I wish I knew.
As for computing power . . . I'm not very knowledgeable there, either. I'm using a HP desktop AMD Athlon 64 x 2 Dual Core processor, 32 bit operating system, 3 GB memory, 456 GB drive C with 418 GB free, an internal and an external CD/DVD/RW so I think I've got enough.
But I'm sure willing to read any recommendations.