dave1949
Super Star Member
I'm not advocating anything. Just an observation over the years. The energy industry is one that passes on all increased cost to the consumer in the interest of paying big dividends to stockholders/ and salaries to executives. I do my part to conserve and use less. BUT! When consumers use less= 1)less taxes collected so government then raises taxes to compensate. A few years back Denver residents were asked to conserve water. They did, so well in fact that revenue from water sales was so low that they implemented a rate hike to compensate. Water is the oil of the future. We can live without oil, try living without water. I'm just a person fed up with getting fleeced at every opportunity. For the record, I think we need a whole lot LESS of government.
I think we are all tired of getting fleeced. Paying for BP mistakes is another form of getting fleeced when the cost could have been avoided. Is that what you mean?
Water is an issue. I have often wondered why there are no desalination plants in places like CA where water seems to be in short supply. It must be the economics of the plants. I think recycled water may be coming into the picture. Sounds yucky, but if you consider a river that supplies a string of towns along it's course - fairly common in the East, the further downstream a town is, the more recycled water they are using.
Dave.