Model year: 1993Date Purchased: 2009-05-30Number of Hours: 1000
"The L2650 was the first tractor I ever bought that wasn't a lawn tractor. I bought it used off a guy that used it for mowing his field with a Woods Finish Mower. It works like a champ, and has served me well. I only wish it had a bucket and 4WD now. If I find one like that, I will definitely buy it! "
REVIEWER'S ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Pros: Reliability.Cons: Mine is 2WD only.Type of User: Homeowner 10-50 AcresLocation: USA PAI also considered buying: REVIEWER'S PHOTOS
Great, But Set Screws are Heinous and Need to Be Changed
Model year: 1993Date Purchased: 2011-10-10Number of Hours: 750
"I love the quality and what looks like awesome reliability. But upon install, the 8 set bolts (4 on each 3-pt lower assy) are just way too long. 4" or so. They hang off and stickout in an ugly manner. To me, they and simply present an safty issue when rolling around the landscape potentially. I'll cut them down, but they need a qualty small bolt or allen set w/ some threadlock or something. Change these please!
REVIEWER'S ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Pros: Qualty and can take a beating! Cons: Need some labor on 4" set bolts on 3pt. Type of User: Homeowner 10-50 AcresLocation: USA MII also considered buying: REVIEWER'S PHOTOS
by wayne yole
Model year: 1997Date Purchased: 2012-01-10Number of Hours: 760
"Nice compact tractor."
REVIEWER'S ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Pros: Like very much.Cons: None.Type of User: Homeowner 100+ AcresLocation: USA NYI also considered buying: REVIEWER'S PHOTOS
Excellent Tractor for small landscape/construction or homeowner
by Chase Jenkins
Model year: 1994Date Purchased: 2006-05-09Number of Hours: 2000
"Overall a great tractor, my model is 4wd which allows this little, less than 30 hp machine, do the work of a much larger 2wd machine. I bought it from a man who had used it a few years but eventually got to old to get out much and it just got put in the barn (explains the low hours). I wish it had a Hydrostatic transmission though because of the amount of loader work I do. The only thing I would change if I could would be to have a little more lift capacity on the loader, the thing WILL NOT pick up a full bucket of dirt if it's the least bit wet."
REVIEWER'S ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Pros: 4WD, small and agile, reliableCons: weak loader, gear transmission (not really a con, but I'd like the Hydrostatic)Type of User: Commercial LandscapeLocation: USA NCI also considered buying: REVIEWER'S PHOTOS