Gale Hawkins
Super Member
- Joined
- Sep 20, 2009
- Messages
- 8,262
- Location
- Murray, KY
- Tractor
- 1948 Allis Chambers Model B 1976 265 MF / 1983 JD 310B Backhoe / 1966 Ford 3000 Diesel / 1980 3600 Diesel
I know bias tires are preferred over radial tires for like bush hogging where past work has left hard stobs because they are more puncture resistant but radials give a better ride with less soil compaction.
My question has more to do with rear farm tread tires. In bias tires where you have the option of 8 or 12 ply for basically the same price (5% more for 12 ply I have had people tell me a stob will get either tire about the same under the same condition?
I can see the point that a 8 ply might have more give then a 12 ply but my thought is the 12 ply would be harder to knock a hole through the tire. I understand the 12 ply gives more load range because our size BKT in the 8 ply version max PSI is 25 but in 12 ply version is 36 PSI. In hard pulling the sidewalls would not deform so much at the higher pressure but may permit a stob to knock a hole through the tread with greater of easy?
Again I am talking about stobs and not steel spikes as in an old piece of equipment hidden in the bramble.
Our 16.9-28 are fluid filled. Is there an increased risk of a flat, decrease or no change in experience or from research with filled vs not filled rear tires?
I know old hard tires can better deflect stobs but I also know they make ice and snow removal harder due to less traction.
My question has more to do with rear farm tread tires. In bias tires where you have the option of 8 or 12 ply for basically the same price (5% more for 12 ply I have had people tell me a stob will get either tire about the same under the same condition?
I can see the point that a 8 ply might have more give then a 12 ply but my thought is the 12 ply would be harder to knock a hole through the tire. I understand the 12 ply gives more load range because our size BKT in the 8 ply version max PSI is 25 but in 12 ply version is 36 PSI. In hard pulling the sidewalls would not deform so much at the higher pressure but may permit a stob to knock a hole through the tread with greater of easy?
Again I am talking about stobs and not steel spikes as in an old piece of equipment hidden in the bramble.
Our 16.9-28 are fluid filled. Is there an increased risk of a flat, decrease or no change in experience or from research with filled vs not filled rear tires?
I know old hard tires can better deflect stobs but I also know they make ice and snow removal harder due to less traction.