Mosby2015
New member
Hopefully this is the right forum to post this in, I am currently trying to decide between a compact tractor and a Ventrac. I own about 5 acres in a rural area. My land is mostly flat with a few steep bank areas I need to mow, but with a large area of wet field that I currently need to wait for a fairly dry stretch of time to bush hog. Usually I can usually do that once a year, although the past few years it has rained too much so it has been about 3 years since it got bush hogged. It is a mess right now. But this is the longest stretch it hasn't gotten mowed. A Ventrac could mow it just about anytime I think, and mow the rest of the property with a finish mower.
As far as I can tell the 2 largest differences for me between a CUT and a Ventrac are the CUT will still need to wait for the field to dry out before I mow it, and I will need to get another mower for the rest of the property. It isn't spread out enough to mow with a CUT and a finish mower, Even a Mid mount, mostly due to height. A good part of the property is a small orchard. A tractor couldn't mow that area for me. The Ventrac could mow all of my property but the bucket seems to be a stop gap because that is the biggest con people have with the Ventrac as a replacement tractor.
I do have some projects in mind for the property, a few out buildings, possibly another smaller pole barn ( has a large pole barn on site now) Every thing I read says having the bucket is a game changer and even though I can only think of a few things to use it on, it seems like those who have one feel once they have it they can't imagine not having it.
So anyone on here with experience owning/operating both what are you feelings about them? Have you gone from a CUT to a Ventrac and not looked back? Or did you end up going the other way? Ventrac is as expensive as a CUT so cost wise I think it is a fair comparison. I will need to buy a stand alone mower if I go with the CUT so cost wise the pendulum does swing a bit towards the Ventrac, I think. And a zero turn for most of my mowing would probably do better than a Ventrac anyway. And they are available used pretty reasonably. So for a zero turn I would go that route. Ventrac's are harder to come by used and usually aren't enough of a price difference to make sense to buy a used unit with no warranty vs a new unit.
As far as I can tell the 2 largest differences for me between a CUT and a Ventrac are the CUT will still need to wait for the field to dry out before I mow it, and I will need to get another mower for the rest of the property. It isn't spread out enough to mow with a CUT and a finish mower, Even a Mid mount, mostly due to height. A good part of the property is a small orchard. A tractor couldn't mow that area for me. The Ventrac could mow all of my property but the bucket seems to be a stop gap because that is the biggest con people have with the Ventrac as a replacement tractor.
I do have some projects in mind for the property, a few out buildings, possibly another smaller pole barn ( has a large pole barn on site now) Every thing I read says having the bucket is a game changer and even though I can only think of a few things to use it on, it seems like those who have one feel once they have it they can't imagine not having it.
So anyone on here with experience owning/operating both what are you feelings about them? Have you gone from a CUT to a Ventrac and not looked back? Or did you end up going the other way? Ventrac is as expensive as a CUT so cost wise I think it is a fair comparison. I will need to buy a stand alone mower if I go with the CUT so cost wise the pendulum does swing a bit towards the Ventrac, I think. And a zero turn for most of my mowing would probably do better than a Ventrac anyway. And they are available used pretty reasonably. So for a zero turn I would go that route. Ventrac's are harder to come by used and usually aren't enough of a price difference to make sense to buy a used unit with no warranty vs a new unit.