goeduck
Super Member
Probably correct. One more reason to keep those freezers as full as possible.
Absolutely, keeps the cycling to a minimum and the runtime when they do run to a maximum. Longer life.
Probably correct. One more reason to keep those freezers as full as possible.
I will be finished running my 7 day straight with an empty freezer having found a place to tuck it out of the way. I will pick up 15 gallons of distilled water (which I use with coolant) and after freezing and stabilizing the temp for a few days rerun the 7 day test and see if it does use fewer Kwh's.
So after running the test with a full vs empty freezer for one week I found the empty one used 15.6 Kwh and the full one used 15.1 Kwh. Not a significant difference.
When we buy our Freezer Paks (beef, pork, poultry, veggies, etc) in the Fall, we fill all 4 5-8 cu ft freezers full. As the food is used, things get shuffled around to keep the other freezers full and a little later one or two can be emptied and shut off.
So after running the test with a full vs empty freezer for one week I found the empty one used 15.6 Kwh and the full one used 15.1 Kwh. Not a significant difference.
Same way we use ours. We have 6 in the 7-9.5cuft range, plus one spare 7cuft, plus a 14 and 18cuft upright. The uprights get used to quick freeze meat when we slaughter a pig or beef, then they are turned off and stored in the walk-in cooler. This time of year, they are at their fullest point, all 6.
Wife is canning some of the breakfast sausage to save freezer room:
![]()
And I made 25lbs of summer sausage out of 15lbs of beef pulled out of the freezer and 10lbs of fresh pork.
![]()
Would have thought it would be greater savings. Another rumor shot down !
So after running the test with a full vs empty freezer for one week I found the empty one used 15.6 Kwh and the full one used 15.1 Kwh. Not a significant difference.
Would that be an upright or chest freezer?