Threepoint
Veteran Member
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2014
- Messages
- 2,233
- Location
- No. VA
- Tractor
- Kubota B2150HST w/ LA350 loader, Kubota GF1800 HST, Kioti CK3510SE HST w/ KL4030 loader, Kioti NX4510HST/cab w/ KL6010 loader
I haven't paid much attention to this up to now, but I've noticed that for CUTs with similar frame sizes, the published specs of one tractor brand might state gross (or net) engine HP and PTO HP at, say, 2600 "rated rpm", while another might state it at 2800 "rated rpm".
I know only enough about power and torque curves at this point to be dangerous to myself and others. But I do know that engine and PTP hp is typically measured with a dynamometer, thus measuring rotational force, and that HP = Torque x RPM div by 5252.
If that is so, then unless the torque for the specific engines being measured actually drops as the rpm rises above 2600, then the measured HP should rise as the rpm increases, no? Conversely, it should drop slightly as the rpm decreases.
My specific question is this: If we have two CUTs in the same frame class, and both claim gross engine horsepower of 50 HP, but the first brand is rated at 2600 rpm and the second at 2800, does the second actually have less HP if rated at 2600? There may be more to this than I'm taking into account, but if a buyer is simply trying to compare HP in a particular instance, is using a higher rated rpm in the published specifications perhaps a way for a brand to enhance the marketing appeal?
I know only enough about power and torque curves at this point to be dangerous to myself and others. But I do know that engine and PTP hp is typically measured with a dynamometer, thus measuring rotational force, and that HP = Torque x RPM div by 5252.
If that is so, then unless the torque for the specific engines being measured actually drops as the rpm rises above 2600, then the measured HP should rise as the rpm increases, no? Conversely, it should drop slightly as the rpm decreases.
My specific question is this: If we have two CUTs in the same frame class, and both claim gross engine horsepower of 50 HP, but the first brand is rated at 2600 rpm and the second at 2800, does the second actually have less HP if rated at 2600? There may be more to this than I'm taking into account, but if a buyer is simply trying to compare HP in a particular instance, is using a higher rated rpm in the published specifications perhaps a way for a brand to enhance the marketing appeal?