I'm in the market for a new flail mower and don't want to pay top dollar for an Alamo or Vrismo. I've had the bottom-end Titan flail mowers, and they simply don't hold up. I can list all the weaknesses.
So I'm strongly considering buying a WoodMax FM-78 mower to go behind my Kubota L4060 HSTC. I realize I'm on the bottom end of PTO horsepower for that size mower, but the rep from WoodMaxx told me using the side slicer knives would require less HP than the hammers and he thought it would be fine for mowing my application of dense field grass, but no trees or brush.
According to the rep, these mowers are designed in the USA and made in China. The Titan mowers are simply a 100% Chinese designed and made mower rebadged as a Titan and sold here. The Titan mowers have all kinds of problems, from a terrible belt tensioner system, hard to find belts, terribly-placed grease fittings, top-link mounts that inevitably shear off, and a weak housing that actually bends. They also use hammers which are flat...and eventually hold impacted grass and dirt, causing vibration and poor cut quality. The roller is too small and the scraper aids only in assisting clogging out the rear. I've had the entire roller fall off. Keep in mind I've owned three 72" Titans and all have had similar failures. I still have my last one, with reinforced welded plates added to the uprights for the top link, new belts I eventually got to fit after several different lengths, scraper bar removed, and just given up on the roller to actually roll. In fairness to the Titan, I've never had a problem with the gearbox or main drum. I did have one of the mounting stations break off on a rock impact but I was able to re-weld it. That could happen to any brand, I guess.
In studying the WoodMaxx flail, there appear to be several design advantages. One is a seemingly much stronger upright system for the top link mount. There are no folds in the metal like there are on the Titan. Furthermore, I can see the grease fitting locations are better. WM claims name-brand NSK bearings. There are some lifting points that are labeled. There is a standard slip clutch on the driveshaft. There is a "trash door" on the back for easier cleaning access as well as the possibility of leaving it open for cutting in dense areas (with no one around).
The drum and mounting stations seem to be the same size and type as the Titan, although Y knives are offered (which I would take). The W-M hammers are duck-foot wedge style and probably wouldn't catch impacted debris as much. The roller on the back also seems to be too small, but the trash door being open might solve that problem.
I noticed there is a normal belt tensioner as well, with standard Gates belts.
Thoughts?
So I'm strongly considering buying a WoodMax FM-78 mower to go behind my Kubota L4060 HSTC. I realize I'm on the bottom end of PTO horsepower for that size mower, but the rep from WoodMaxx told me using the side slicer knives would require less HP than the hammers and he thought it would be fine for mowing my application of dense field grass, but no trees or brush.
According to the rep, these mowers are designed in the USA and made in China. The Titan mowers are simply a 100% Chinese designed and made mower rebadged as a Titan and sold here. The Titan mowers have all kinds of problems, from a terrible belt tensioner system, hard to find belts, terribly-placed grease fittings, top-link mounts that inevitably shear off, and a weak housing that actually bends. They also use hammers which are flat...and eventually hold impacted grass and dirt, causing vibration and poor cut quality. The roller is too small and the scraper aids only in assisting clogging out the rear. I've had the entire roller fall off. Keep in mind I've owned three 72" Titans and all have had similar failures. I still have my last one, with reinforced welded plates added to the uprights for the top link, new belts I eventually got to fit after several different lengths, scraper bar removed, and just given up on the roller to actually roll. In fairness to the Titan, I've never had a problem with the gearbox or main drum. I did have one of the mounting stations break off on a rock impact but I was able to re-weld it. That could happen to any brand, I guess.
In studying the WoodMaxx flail, there appear to be several design advantages. One is a seemingly much stronger upright system for the top link mount. There are no folds in the metal like there are on the Titan. Furthermore, I can see the grease fitting locations are better. WM claims name-brand NSK bearings. There are some lifting points that are labeled. There is a standard slip clutch on the driveshaft. There is a "trash door" on the back for easier cleaning access as well as the possibility of leaving it open for cutting in dense areas (with no one around).
The drum and mounting stations seem to be the same size and type as the Titan, although Y knives are offered (which I would take). The W-M hammers are duck-foot wedge style and probably wouldn't catch impacted debris as much. The roller on the back also seems to be too small, but the trash door being open might solve that problem.
I noticed there is a normal belt tensioner as well, with standard Gates belts.
Thoughts?