MESSMAKER
Veteran Member
The #s on the 6 cylinder look very good. If you don't do a lot of towing, I suspect it should do just fine. Sound very close to the current v8 lineup when it comes to straight HP.
I am curious how the twin turbo V6 will do on real world mileage numbers. I had a 1995 extended cab 4x4 Dakota with 3.9L V6 and it got 12 on my daily commute with 20 on the freeway. This was replaced with a '99 GMC Ex. Cab 4x4 Short Bed with 5.3L/3.73 gear which got around 16 on the same daily commute with 17 on the freeway. I realize that the new twin turbo is 15 years newer but??? My guess is that they will average within 2mpg from 3.5L to 6.2L real world driving.
The only V6 I ever had in a truck was a 4.3 in a 94 Chevy 1/2 ton reg cab. It was peppy for a V6 and very reliable, also easy to work on. Not much for towing, though.
You think so? My buddy's Mazda SUV has a turbo. If he drives above 2000rpm when it starts to kick in, he gets about the same MPGs as I do in the F150 with a 5.4. So I don't think a turbo is any big gas saver.we will probably start seeing alot more TT V6s.
You think so? My buddy's Mazda SUV has a turbo. If he drives above 2000rpm when it starts to kick in, he gets about the same MPGs as I do in the F150 with a 5.4. So I don't think a turbo is any big gas saver.
Behave? Solid? I don't understand what you mean.I think the Mazda gives up some mpgs in order to get it to behave. Several of the Asian trucks have turbos and are more than solid.
You think so? My buddy's Mazda SUV has a turbo. If he drives above 2000rpm when it starts to kick in, he gets about the same MPGs as I do in the F150 with a 5.4. So I don't think a turbo is any big gas saver.
That's funny because I said this new engine lineup was interesting and honestly IF they prove to be reliable I would definitely give them a look when I replace my truck. But if you want to be one of those that just agrees with everyone else to avoid voicing your true opinion then so be it.